63 pointsby SilverElfin19 hours ago7 comments
  • toomuchtodo19 hours ago
    EFF: Yes, You Have the Right to Film ICE - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/02/yes-you-have-right-fil... - February 12th, 2025

    EFF: Federal Judge Upholds Arizonans’ Right to Record the Police - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/08/federal-judge-upholds-... - August 11th, 2023

    EFF: Fourth Circuit: Individuals Have a First Amendment Right to Livestream Their Own Traffic Stops - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2023/02/fourth-circuit-individ... - February 23rd, 2023

    EFF: Victory! Another Court Protects the Right to Record Police - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/07/victory-another-court-... - July 12th, 2022

    (Others? Reply with them!)

  • duxup19 hours ago
    This administration is just a bunch of "the law is what we say it is when it is convenient for us to say it is X". The constitution and actual law doesn't apply to them as far as they are concerned.

    And of course that means isn't the same law for you and me.

    • kelseyfrog13 hours ago
      I wouldn't take legal advice from the executive branch.
      • duxup13 hours ago
        I think you can only be sure the president will protect himself.

        Some of his past allies have been put in some bad positions and it doesn’t seem Trump cares.

  • Havoc15 hours ago
    Obviously they want that...ICE is busy shooting people fleeing them and assaulting unarmed people

    https://www.reddit.com/r/NextGenRebellion/comments/1q6n823/i...

    https://imgur.com/gallery/ice-escalates-violence-hours-after...

    Very much tracks that the administration would want to suppress that

  • chrisjj19 hours ago
    > The Trump administration believes you don't have the right to record Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers in public.

    We know the administration claims that. We don't know it believes that.

    • SilverElfin19 hours ago
      But by repeating these things over and over, they create a chilling effect (after all they might shoot you in broad daylight) and also normalize the idea so they can then arrest people over it. Kristi Noem is using the word “doxxing” to describe recording and posting videos. And then describes doxxing as “violence”. Right wing Twitter is eating up this characterization and is asking the administration to jail people for recording. They’re priming the public to support such blatant violations of the first amendment.
  • password5432116 hours ago
    Either you fight for your rights or it gets worse. Clearly Trump and ICE don't care about your freedom or rights, so you now have to decide whether you submit or resist.
  • allears19 hours ago
    Fortunately, administrative department heads do not get to create or modify the law. Not that that's goiing to stop anybody.
    • treetalker18 hours ago
      Of related interest: recent SCOTUS mumblings about counter-agency and counter-Executive doctrines, including the Unitary Executive Theory's necessary implication of a Unitary Legislative counterpart. See https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/01/did-justice-kagan-debilit....
    • iAMkenough19 hours ago
      They do get to tell their agents how to enforce illegal "laws," and a majority of Congress will accept that.
  • SilverElfin19 hours ago
    > Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem said, "Violence is anything that threatens them and their safety, so it is doxing them, it's videotaping them where they're at when they're out on operations, encouraging other people to come and to throw things, rocks, bottles."