Most legal AI tools are probabilistic—they predict the next word. Claudit is deterministic. It uses a syntax engine to audit the mathematical certainty of a sentence. It flags passive voice, future-tense traps (like 'shall'), and unmeasurable adverbs (like 'reasonably') that create liability gaps.
We're currently in beta. I’ve integrated Moonpay for credits and we're using wallet IDs as API keys for developers who want to build this into their own AI Agents.
The Tech: Python/FastAPI on Render, React/Tailwind on Netlify. The Ask: I'd love for this community to poke at the logic. Does a deterministic approach to law make sense to you, or is the ambiguity of "Standard English" a feature, not a bug?
I'm here to answer any questions about the engine or the API!