33 pointsby zdwa day ago1 comment
  • zylenta day ago
    Honestly, this only really helps people in rural areas. The vast majority of urban 5GHz implementations are at 80MHz - 6GHz does allow for 160MHz channelization, but at 320MHz the attenuation is so great that most homes will require multiple APs to actually hit appropriate MCS indexes.
    • chrisandchris18 hours ago
      Fot at home, I tend to stick with 2.4 GHz. It is slower, but with a <100 Mbit uplink to the internet, local speed does not matter. 2.4 does just work better with less APs and thicker walls.
      • lxgr11 hours ago
        This also only works if you're not living in an apartment building. Even then, there's Bluetooth and other things that don't share spectrum nicely with 802.11.
      • SuperMouse17 hours ago
        I have at least 10 neighbours on each 2.4GHz channel.
    • kotaKata day ago
      That's why it's been normalized to buy five of those mesh WiFi routers and shove them all over your house, everybody's signal be damned.
      • avidiaxa day ago
        Having lots of lower powered routers is actually better for interference.

        MacOS won't roam properly unless the signal from the connected AP drops below -75db, so cranking the power on all your APs will give you worse performance if you move around.

        • lxgr11 hours ago
          That's only on non-steered roaming though, right? I believe Apple devices have long supported AP/network-side steering.
      • lxgr11 hours ago
        Since most devices these days only transmit as strongly as they need to, this is actually great for spectrum sharing.