According to the author, the future is an abundance of low-quality immature AI generated software which is worse than the state of the art?

So NIH syndrome, rolling your own cryptography and security through obscurity is now the future because LLMs.

Sounds quite naive.

> I found LLVM to be a pretty polished codebase with lots of documentation. Despite the high-quality, navigating the codebase is challenging as it’s a mass of interfaces and abstractions in order to support: multiple object file formats, 13+ ISAs, a slough of features (i.e. linker scripts ) and multiple operating systems.

This is an obvious skill issue on the authors front; LLVM is a high quality project to build on top of and use for a reason. It is well maintained and trusted.

The linker that was created will be just thrown away. With less eyes; it will fade into obscurity.