42 pointsby sandeberta month ago4 comments
  • brushfoota month ago
    These AI Overviews are awful. I've been documenting the ones I've gotten over the past few months. Examples:

    - 2025-09-19. My query: "is mics an abbreviation for micrograms." AI Overview: "No, MICs is not an abbreviation for micrograms; it is an abbreviation for Minimum Inhibitory Concentration."

    - 2025-09-19. My query: "75 mics of medication." AI Overview: "When discussing medication, 'mics' is a common abbreviation for micrograms (mcg)."

    - 2025-11-03. My query: "copilot 'replace string in file'." AI Overview: "While Copilot in tools like Visual Studio Code can assist with code generation and refactoring, its primary function is not directly to perform 'replace string in file' operations across an entire project." ("Replace string in file" is the name of an operation that Copilot performs, and I was looking for more info about how it works.)

    - 2025-11-22. My query: "u2 'spirits move you'." AI Overview: "The phrase 'spirits move you' is not a direct U2 song title, but it likely refers to their song 'With or Without You,' a famous track from their album The Joshua Tree." (Who said anything about it being a "direct U2 song title"? It's a lyric from "Mysterious Ways.")

    It's so frequently wrong and so frequently makes insulting assumptions that it's worse than worthless. And when you click the "Dive deeper in AI mode" button at the bottom, the new response often contradicts the old one. Just garbage.

    • Gorkysa month ago
      I asked

      > Is a panda or a Clio bigger

      Would have thought it was obvious I was talking about cars? Its reply was hilarious:

      > A Renault Clio is much bigger than a giant panda. While a panda can be 4 to 6 feet long and 2 to 3 feet tall, a Clio is typically 4.053 meters long and 1.440 meters tall, making it significantly larger in all dimensions, according to Auto Express and CarsGuide.

    • duskwuffa month ago
      Not mine, but:

      Query: "max amps 22 awg"

      AI Overview: "A 22 American Wire Gauge (AWG) copper wire can carry a maximum of 551 amps. Here are the fusing currents for some other AWG wire sizes..."

      (A fusing current is the current that will instantly melt and possibly even vaporize a wire. The safe operating limit is two or three orders of magnitude lower.)

      • londons_explorea month ago
        I mean it isn't technically wrong...

        Sometimes you need to know how much current is guaranteed to vaporize a bit of wire - for example if you are designing a fusible link.

        • duskwuffa month ago
          While this is true - it's the reason why fusing current was measured in the first place - it is not a reasonable way to answer a question asking for "max amps".
          • QuercusMaxa month ago
            should have asked for the max safe amps
    • a month ago
      undefined
    • halfmatthalfcata month ago
      Welcome to Slopworld
  • therobots927a month ago
    I Googled “can X and Y medications be combined” today actually and to my surprise was provided with an AI overview. It took the cautious route and recommended they not be combined, but I’m surprised that AI overviews for this type of thing would be allowed. In the event that someone were incorrectly advised to combine X and Y and died as a result, would it be possible for a lawyer to subpoena the search history of the individual and hold Google liable for giving incorrect medical advice?

    Edit: Expanding the thought process here, if the DOJ wanted to could they force Google to release records of instances when such health-related queries were made, and instances where that was the last thing the person had googled since?

  • greatgiba month ago
    The problem is not the search or some AI generated bullshit.

    The problem is that we need to teach again to people that not everything they read from internet or AI is true. Starting at the young age!

  • kotaKata month ago
    >> A Google spokesperson said that many of the health examples shared with them were “incomplete screenshots”, but from what they could assess they linked “to well-known, reputable sources and recommend seeking out expert advice”.

    Do Google employees get expert instruction on how to gaslight people, or does that come naturally from their dating lives?