37 pointsby montroser10 hours ago3 comments
  • ajb2 hours ago
    For a moment I thought this was actual co-ax, which would be supremely ironic (it was used in the early days of Ethernet, but twisted pair proved cheaper). But it looks like neither candidate has a conductive core, although they do have the conductive shell.
    • kristjank2 hours ago
      Coax, or more accurately twin-ax is still the underlying technology for Direct Attachment Copper cables for Ethernet using pluggable modules.
  • Animats6 hours ago
    Tiny waveguides in cable form. Cute.
    • qeternity2 hours ago
      As someone with no experience in the domain, this sounds really interesting.

      But one of the companies mentioned has been attempting this for 9 years.

      Why hasn't this taken off already? It doesn't seem we're in need of any breakthroughs. So where do the economics break down?

      • kristjank2 hours ago
        Precision manufacturing at scale. The physics of merging a hundred-gigahertz-scale circuit board track into a waveguide are very unforgiving. The physics governing the tolerances of said waveguide are similar.
  • fancyfredbot2 hours ago
    Very clever stuff. I wonder how their power consumption compares to copper with a retimer.