7 pointsby m-hodgesa month ago3 comments
  • turtleyachta month ago
    • m-hodgesa month ago
      Thanks; I think it got stripped off when I posted?
  • ggma month ago
    If memory serves me right, the French tax collection process tried to include declarations for immoral earnings, some decades ago. I'm not sure how well it went.
  • chasing0entropya month ago
    Cool story: despite obvious racketeering, murder, assault, bribery, corruption, and trafficking associations, what ultimately got capone was the IRS.
    • throw310822a month ago
      Not unrelated: I guess the obligation to declare bribes as income allows the IRS to investigate you for tax evasion if they suspect you're receiving (obviously undeclared) bribes.
      • chasing0entropya month ago
        Actually if you declare the income and classify it correctly you are clear from an income oersoective; by disclosing the crime you risk confiscation and prosecution but neither would involve the irs beyond certification of your submissions. Source: armchair cpa
        • throw310822a month ago
          But isn't that the point? If you don't declare the crime you're liable for tax evasion and can be prosecuted by the irs; if you do, you're going to be prosecuted by a different authority. And since nobody is going to self-incriminate, when they catch you you'll be prosecuted both for corruption and tax evasion.