However, I dislike the usual entrepreneur framing around this stuff. I'm absolutely not a fan of "find problems so you can extract money from them" as the starting motivation. If you treat other people's frustrations primarily as 'market signals', to use the HN lingo, you end up optimising for what generates profit, not what actually helps. The best tools I've seen come from taking the user's problem seriously, building with them, and caring whether the solution improves their day even if it never becomes a business.

If this directory nudges you towards that (listening first, then building something small that actually addresses real needs for real people) then it's already doing something useful. If it proves genuinely valuable and people keep coming back, monetisation can be a downstream choice. I'd rather see "make it work and make it useful" come first, and only then decide whether it needs to be paid for, funded, open, or just free because society doesn't need every helpful thing to be gated -- on the contrary.

To frame it more cynically, someone could read this as "I'm hunting for easy victims and monetisable pain" and then the obvious question is: why would anyone hand you the blueprint for how to rip them off?