devalexwells9 hours ago
For me, no. I hate writing applications, but not sure automating all of it is beneficial to either party. Applying sucks, I get it, but...
As an applicant, I often discover reasons for or against applying for a company during the application process.
As an interviewer, it's not a dealbreaker, but it definitely stands out when someone puts in the effort to write a clear, thoughtful application.
So it would depend heavily on what the "savings" are here. Where does "20+ hours" come from?
- nguyensonatx7 hours ago
  That’s fair, and I actually agree with a lot of this. I don’t think everything should be automated, especially the parts where thinking and intent matter.
  The “20+ hours” is mostly coming from the mechanical stuff: re-entering the same work history, dates, education, addresses, citizenship questions, etc. over and over across different ATSs. Not the cover letter, not the custom questions.
  Ideally, the goal would be to reduce fatigue so people can put more effort into the thoughtful parts, not less.
JohnFen8 hours ago
This would not be of interest to me because it wouldn't mesh at all with my job hunting methodology.
- nguyensonatx7 hours ago
  That's totally fair and I really appreciate your feedback on this!