38 pointsby hurrycane4 hours ago5 comments
  • davidsainez10 minutes ago
    Excited to put this through its paces. It seems most directly comparable to GPT-OSS-20B. Comparing their numbers on the Together API: Trinity Mini is slightly less expensive ($0.045/$0.15 v $0.05/$0.20) and seems to have better latency and throughput numbers.
  • halJordan3 hours ago
    Looks like a less good version of qwen 30b3a which makes sense bc it is slightly smaller. If they can keep that effiency going into the large one it'll be sick.

    Trinity Large [will be] a 420B parameter model with 13B active parameters. Just perfect for a large Ram pool @ q4.

  • ksynwa19 minutes ago
    > Trinity Large is currently training on 2048 B300 GPUs and will arrive in January 2026.

    How long does the training take?

  • htrp3 hours ago
    Trinity Nano Preview: 6B parameter MoE (1B active, ~800M non-embedding), 56 layers, 128 experts with 8 active per token

    Trinity Mini: 26B parameter MoE (3B active), fully post-trained reasoning model

    They did pretraining on their own and are still training the large version on 2048 B300 GPUs

  • bitwize3 hours ago
    A moe model you say? How kawaii is it? uwu
    • ghc3 hours ago
      Capitalization makes a surprising amount of difference here...
    • donw2 hours ago
      Meccha at present, but it may reach sugoi levels with fine-tuning.
    • noxa3 hours ago
      I hate that I laughed at this. Thanks ;)