3 pointsby keepamovin9 hours ago2 comments
  • PaulHoule9 hours ago
    I wouldn't say that human intelligence is "the pinnacle" but I do think that more intelligence might not turn into the ability to solve harder problems.

    For instance the problem with high energy physics is not that people don't have ideas but rather we have limited experimental and observational results that would let us tell one theory from another.

    Similarly I don't think more intelligence would help in solving the Collatz conjecture.

    • keepamovin9 hours ago
      This is a good distinction between "intelligence" and data. I think we talk the same stuffs! :)
      • gsf_emergency_64 hours ago
        Do we here all agree then that there's more than enough "moral data" out there?

        Maybe too much?

        Both extents are consistent with Sutskever's ideology that Lossy Compression [Reduction?] Is all U Need (probably superseding AIaUN)

  • bluesky192837469 hours ago
    Hey, i think there's no such thing as an upper limit and we can always go further or become better. We will never reach the maximum, we can only reach the limit that we won't cross.