20 pointsby rolph19 hours ago6 comments
  • j1elo17 hours ago
    Say some young folk is coming back home very wasted after a good night party, and mistakes his house. The fact that it depends on the good or bad judgement of his neighbor to end up dead that night, is objectively not something that makes society better. Why are people even allowed to wield a gun without due process and frequent psycho-technical test evaluations? (so as to not get into the "why at all" question). My instinct here (as a non-american) is that if you're allowing citizens to have firearms, it ought at least to be only for those best prepared to evaluate conditions and situations, not anyone who's been watching YouTube videos as a poor-man's replacement for proper training.
    • rolph16 hours ago
      decades ago, this scenario occured with a highschool hangaround.

      he was drunk and high, came back from a party, actually broke in through his nieghbours door, 3 doors away, and encountered a 70 some year old cowering man who fearedfor life and safety, stabbed him and nearly killed him.

      police closed the "case" and both parties charges were dismissed.

      it would have been different if the door wasnt breached.

      in the case in topic, it would have been different if both parties announced themselves, and cleaner took the hint from google map inconsistencies.

      Even if a building, is suppossed to be empty, or unoccupied, Always confirm with your client you are at the right place, Announce Yourself, and avoid costly mistaken jobsite identification.

      the blame goes all around here.

      we have similar stand your ground laws where i am, and we call people, or call out while "walking up on someone"

      we are also not allowed to carry on someone private property unless explicit, and enduring permission is given by the owner/controller of the property.

      • Jtsummers16 hours ago
        > the blame goes all around here.

        A man shoots through a closed and locked door that no one is actually knocking down, and you think the housecleaner fumbling through keys on the porch is at all to blame for her own death? He was a paranoid coward who probably would have killed a neighbor kid one day if he hadn't killed her first.

        > we have similar stand your ground laws where i am, and we call people, or call out while "walking up on someone"

        You actually shout this when walking down the street behind someone? What a terrible place you must live in.

        • rolph15 hours ago
          its called alaska, and as i said, the blame goes all around, its called a swiss cheese failure, in HN parlance.

          numerous mistakes by numerous parties combine, to culminate in failure and consequence.

          here in alaska, you dont just assume, you have the right place, you take measures to be sure you are where you actually think you are.

          that means when you walk onto private property not your own, you call out to make contact, and you dont carry a firearm onto property unless given specific permission to do so.

          • Jtsummers14 hours ago
            In the rest of the country, we usually call shooting unarmed people who happened to go to the wrong house and killing them "murder". She was not breaking into the house, she was not armed, she was not threatening him in any way. He lived in a neighborhood (look at the photo of the house). People go to the wrong house all the time in neighborhoods, the normal response is not to shoot them (I doubt this is even normal in Alaska as you seem to be saying it is). The normal, not paranoid coward, response is to ignore them or turn them away.
            • rolph14 hours ago
              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_cheese_model

              google errors, wrong house, no confirmation of address, trying keys at door, twitchy gun owner, stand your ground laws, political climate.

              these all combine to create a disasterous outcome.

              • rramadass13 hours ago
                From the article;

                After the shooting, Andersen told investigators he had previously watched videos about what to do if someone tries to enter your home and had devised a plan for a potential break-in, according to court records.

                Convinced that was happening, he did not approach the door, turn on a light or call out, court records state. Instead, he allegedly moved to the room he called his “safe room,” unlocked a Pelican case and loaded his Glock pistol.

                Note: he did not approach the door, turn on a light or call out, court records state.

                All he had to do was yell out loudly, turn on the lights or do something to let whoever was outside know that somebody was inside and armed. Instead he just shot without any notice.

                • 11 hours ago
                  undefined
                • rolph12 hours ago
                  All he had to do was yell out loudly, turn on the lights or do something to let whoever was -inside know that someone was outside looking for a jobsite.

                  for that matter when you try to enter someone elses house with a key, it normally starts with

                  'knockknock/ringring "hello smalltime cleaning service im looking for 123 circle boulevard to mop and dust, joe gave me keys, is any one home?"

                  we have housecleaners up here too, and they are very big on a prolonged contact attempt, when its a "walk-in job" thats because if you dont, you are doing what home invaders do, and all you have to do is attempt verbal contact even if you think noone is there, and you have the right place. its seatbelt simple.

                  same the other way, " i dont know you, i didnt ask for service your acting like a burglar, go away from my door, and leave"

                  thats how we do it up here, police are hours, sometimes days away from responding to emergency calls

                  • rramadass8 hours ago
                    Read the article first before you comment;

                    The pair found work as contractors for a cleaning service. On Nov. 5, they were tasked with cleaning the windows of a recently constructed model home that is part of a new housing development directly east of Andersen’s house, court documents say.

                    Shortly before 7 a.m., Ríos Pérez de Velásquez and her husband were standing on the front porch of what they believed was the house they were meant to clean, court records say. Given that it was a model home, the records say, they thought no one was living there and observed no lights on inside or cars in the driveway. The pair started trying the keys.

                    Note: Given that it was a model home, the records say, they thought no one was living there and observed no lights on inside or cars in the driveway.

                    They were told it wasn't occupied and were given keys to enter and clean. Those were the instructions they followed.

                    Do not condone or excuse Murder.

      • lawlessone14 hours ago
        >Always confirm with your client you are at the right place

        maybe you don't intend this , but sounds like victim blaming.

        • rolph12 hours ago
          every thing that went wrong would have been nullified, with one phone call, a phone call that is common place practice when making housecalls.

          everything that went wrong could have been nullified by heed the reality that actions or inactions have consequences.

          providing wrong map info, trusting sketchy information sources, lack of clear communication of purpose, and intent. lack of contact, with humans to confirm or verify.

          its more than a victims contribution, there are second and third parties to look at.

    • knowitnone315 hours ago
      Americans have this thing called the Constitution which states citizens have the right to bear arms. Now, when you allow government to make subjective decisions about who can own and who can't, it's no longer a right and nobody can have guns but criminals somehow always find a gun. If you know anything about what happened, you will find the shooter is actually a very normal person and not some gun nut so any amount of psych testing wouldn't have found anything. What happened was wrong and both sides could have done better to avoid such a situation. Doesn't really matter because shooter is going to jail. And many state do background checks when selling firearms so it's not like a felon can just walk in and buy a gun. But when you're not a felon, how do you predict a person's future behavior by some magic questionnaire?
      • toomuchtodo15 hours ago
        We should potentially revisit the second amendment, considering gun deaths. The Constitution is a living document, and perhaps enough unnecessary deaths are occurring to warrant a fix. Maybe it should be a privilege versus a right.

        https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2025/03/05/what-the-...

        https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/07/24/key-facts...

        (Gun suicide rates are at record highs, but gun murder rates have dipped)

      • Y_Y15 hours ago
        And what about inflation preventing well-organised militias from forming? There ought to be a federal gun credit for every man, woman and child!
      • chillingeffect15 hours ago
        The 2nd amendment is different from the Castle doctrine. You can have the 1st one without the 2nd one.

        A militia to deter occupiers is different from protecting one's own house. And cases like this go beyond the Castle doctrine. This made had no legit fear for his life. Wiggling keys in a door and jiggling door handle don't equal legit fear. You have to at least identify a threat. This shooter was irresponsible and wrecked it for many other responsible people. Government will use this to weaken individuals' 2A rights.

  • pavel_lishin18 hours ago
    > The homeowner, 62-year-old Curt Andersen, allegedly had fired through the front door.

    It sure sounds like Mr. Andersen killed a house cleaner.

    > “After some time,” investigators wrote, “Curt said he didn’t mean for anything to happen to anybody.”

    What does he think happens when a bullet goes through someone?

  • cornhole18 hours ago
    white americans in the middle of nowhere are imagining dangers because they have nothing else going on and it’s ruining life for the rest of us
    • 16 hours ago
      undefined
    • knowitnone315 hours ago
      thanks for your racist contribution
  • michael199917 hours ago
    Oh god - Indiana's castle-law provides civil immunity too. That's awful! That poor man has to raise four orphans without any financial help.
  • rolph19 hours ago
    this is another case of assumptions fed by google mistakes, leading to a fatality.
    • k31018 hours ago
      Shrink Wrap disclaimer for mobile. [0]

        GOOGLE AND ANY SUCH THIRD PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY WARRANTIES REGARDING THE SECURITY, RELIABILITY, TIMELINESS, AND PERFORMANCE OF GOOGLE MAPS AND SUCH THIRD PARTY SOFTWARE.
      
      Translation: worthless.

      In case of disaster, contact the "Thoughts and Prayers Bot" (sarcasm)

      Separately, and hopefully satire: [1]

        U.S. Government Launches “Thoughts & Prayers” Subscription Service to Streamline Response to Tragedies
      
        WASHINGTON, D.C. — In a bold move to modernize federal disaster response, the U.S. government today launched a new “Thoughts & Prayers+” subscription service, allowing Americans to automatically send condolences with one click every time tragedy strikes.
      
        “Why waste precious seconds typing heartfelt responses when you can automate empathy?” said Homeland Sympathy Secretary Chad Grimshaw, unveiling the app alongside a golden emoji of praying hands. “Whether it’s a mass shooting, natural disaster, or devastating celebrity breakup, Thoughts & Prayers+ ensures you’re covered.”  (more)
      
      [0] https://www.google.com/mobile/gmm/terms.html

      [1] https://allchronology.com/2025/06/17/u-s-government-launches...

    • _aavaa_15 hours ago
      Someone gets shot through a door and you are blaming Google for directions rather than the guy with the gun??