This seems pretty critical, no? I would assume that melatonin use increases with the severity of insomnia, and persistent lack of sleep has a whole host of long-term health implications. So insomnia a priori seems highly likely to cause both increased melatonin consumption and heart disease. Given how obviously confounded this causal system is, it's practically negligent to not at least control for severity of insomnia or something. Ideally they should have done a matched study or DID or something, but without any attempt to account for the confounding this study is just clickbait.
But you take melatonin because nobody wants to tell you all this. And you take it at random times thereby fucking up your circadian rhythm even worse.
Don't get me started on vitamin D and how that's _also_ a circadian phase signaller, but how I never see those big flashy press releases about whether or not vitamin D is good or bad ever go into this.
Why do I have so little faith that they controlled for timing in the study?
Some more interesting comments: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/E4cKD9iTWHaE7f3AJ/melatonin-...
TL;DR:
- People take the wrong doses because pharmacies sell pills with huge doses, in reality 0.3 is optimal (can confirm from personal experimentation).
- People treat it like a sleeping pill when in reality it shifts the sleep cycle and it does so _depending on when you take it_. The article has various suggestions depending on your particular sleep issue.
If you use it, I suggest experimenting with the timing and dose, but especially timing - and I am talking multiple hours, up to 7, before going to sleep. And then do actually go to sleep immediately when you feel sleepy or it'll make you wake up too early and you'll be tired.
Good to know but maybe not particularly compelling?