WinObjC – The Windows Bridge for iOS(github.com)
63 pointsby zerr8 days ago5 comments
  • JSR_FDED2 days ago
    I miss Objective-C, it’s just so darn readable (once you know what @ and [] do)
    • millerm2 days ago
      I wholeheartedly agree. I had a great time in Objective-C.
    • fithisux20 hours ago
      Yes Objective-C is THE C with objects.

      I do not understand why Microsoft stopped this effort.

      Paired with Win32 is easier than C++.

  • dardeaup2 days ago
    Missing reference to 2015/2016.
  • 1970-01-012 days ago
    Oh, they've got a well-structured roadmap with milestones. Surely, this is will be a long-lasting bridge. And last commit was 3 years ago. And "This repository was archived by the owner on May 28, 2025. It is now read-only."

    It's dead but still around. This is the stuff ripe for Jia Tan v4.0 to revive and backdoor.

  • sillywalk8 days ago
    Interesting, I never knew about this. I do remember that NeXT ported OPENSTEP to Windows NT as OPENSTEP Enterprise.
    • dottrap2 days ago
      Microsoft's timing was the worst. I think they announced this a year after Swift was already announced, but before Swift was open sourced. So Microsoft wouldn't be able to deal with things like Obj-C/Swift interop which iOS developers were already jumping onto. And Microsoft's Windows 8 mobile initiative was pretty clearly a flop by this point.

      Frankly, this Obj-C effort needed to be done way earlier, starting with AppKit, like back when Microsoft was panicking that OS X 10.4 Tiger was going to kick Longhorn's butt. If these tools had already been proven useful before the dawn of the iPhone, Microsoft might have had a chance of riding the iOS wave.

    • extraduder_ire2 days ago
      I think a separate objective-c runtime was ported to windows by apple for itunes and later safari to work.
      • stuaxoa day ago
        There seem to be bunch of DLLs in iTunes and Safari with familiar names.

        Would have been good if someone made bindings for them, it would have been interesting to see what MacOS like stuff could work there, even if it just python bindings.

      • svth2 days ago
        If I recall correctly, iTunes was a Carbon application. They ported parts of the Carbon APIs to get it running on Windows.
        • agsnu2 days ago
          QuickTime for Windows existed long before then, and Apple ported a bunch of the old Classic Mac Toolbox to Windows as part of that.

          IIRC it was actually this Windows port of Toolbox that in some ways laid the foundation for Carbon - i.e. a port of the Toolbox API to what became Mac OS X.

          • stuaxoa day ago
            Interesting stuff, I wish there was a way it would get open sourced one day.
          • lukeha day ago
            Yes, this is correct.
        • tonyedgecombe2 days ago
          I do remember it had its own font rendering which looked out of place on Windows.
      • fithisux20 hours ago
        There is also GNUStep.
    • malkia2 days ago
      I still have WebObjects 4.5.2, but could not get hands on the YellowBox
  • 2 days ago
    undefined