2 pointsby mitchbob4 months ago3 comments
  • beardyw4 months ago
    > a 96-Year-Old's Defining Artwork

    I don't think sentimentalism should be a factor. That said it looks distinctive enough to save to me.

    • el_benhameen4 months ago
      I have many fond memories of visiting and being amazed by this thing as a kid, but if you’ve seen it recently, it’s in pretty bad shape. “Decrepit” is the term that comes to mind. If it functioned and looked good I’d agree that it’s distinctive enough to keep, but as-is it’s more a symbol of SF’s (thankfully reversing!) decline.
  • bubbajones4 months ago
    [dead]