21 pointsby raw_anon_11114 months ago5 comments
  • wryoak4 months ago
    They didn’t postpone season five of Slow Horses despite being exactly the same content
    • backprop19894 months ago
      The article mentions that Apple paused the show due to geopolitical tensions and its own interests in the region (selling phones to middle eastern customers). Similar reasons to why they cancelled Jon Stewart’s show (which is also mentioned by the article). Slow horses doesn’t really have the same sensitivity - it’s a comedy, which gives it some cover.
      • otterley4 months ago
        Slow Horses is a comedy?! It has some humorous dialogue at times, but ultimately it’s a (rather violent and tense) political drama. Lighthearted and silly, it is not.
  • porcoda4 months ago
    Tehran season 3 had a similar fate due to the situation in the region.

    https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/politics-news/tehran-...

    • hooch4 months ago
      It was still shown in Israel though and can be found online.
    • raw_anon_11114 months ago
      [flagged]
  • RickJWagner4 months ago
    Probably wise at this time. The US could use some cooling and deescalation.
  • gigatexal4 months ago
    Remember when Apple stood for something like when they fought the FBI and won on the San Bernardino case... and here with art, and speech, they're caving to the thin skinned Trump administration. Disgusting. But not irrational. They're not above the administration and are beholden to it... so now that Trump has weaponized every part of government to fill his tiny hands and even smaller ego they are taking steps to stay in his good graces. It's disgusting.
    • bitpush4 months ago
      > Remember when Apple stood for something like when they fought the FBI

      It was very calculated, and not a principled stand like most people would believe. They knew the then government couldnt push them, and they stood to gain the halo effect. "Privacy is human right" followed, and they basked in the glory.

      And now .. they know there's going to be a pushback, and Apple tucks their tail like how they did in China for decades.

      Apple has always been hypocritical, and now it is on full display to even the most ardent fans.

      • gigatexal4 months ago
        Yes Apple has been a bit two faced about things. App Store ads? Yuuuup. Their own ad network? Come on!

        But their privacy stance is still far better than that of Meta or Google. (I guess I could be wrong and I’d be happy to see a study or something that says that.)

        It is an interesting hypothesis to posit that the Trump administration is just calling everyone on their shit and in the case Apple blinked. Or, you could see the Trump administration and he himself for what I think he is trying to be: a king, a despot, and a tyrant and the whole project 2025 retribution cult is just following the play book and attacking woke companies like Apple.

        • bitpush4 months ago
          > But their privacy stance is still far better than that of Meta or Google.

          Agreed, but they kind of stumbled into it. I dont know what to think of it. Apple didnt start out with "We believe ad targeting is bad", if that was the case, they would have never let Facebook on the platform.

          And they never kicked them off of it, even while constantly saying 'ad targeting is bad'.

          • seec4 months ago
            Exactly. Apple has always been inherently duplicitous and knows how to manage image/communicate very well. Marketing is actually one of their best products.

            With all the control they have on the App Store (and they have showed they are perfectly fine using it when it suits them) arguing about privacy is pure virtue signaling when they allow Facebook and Google just fine. And most of their core services/apps could actually work mostly fine in a web browser so it's not like there would absolutely no way to use them. They could very much have strict requirement on data tracking and basically forbid any app doing it and that would actually make the "managed App Store" pretty good. But they don't, because they would lose a shit ton of money in various ways.

            But Apple wants the cake and eats it too. They can't pretend to have principle and just throw them away when it hurts their profit. That's no standard at all but that's how it is. Apple makes pretty good technology but is completely full of shit and I would argue much more than the other usual suspects and that makes them the worse guy actually.

    • 4 months ago
      undefined
  • theturtle4 months ago
    [dead]