32 pointsby Mr_Minderbinder5 months ago5 comments
  • RicoElectrico5 months ago
    One thing NEdit has going for it is its speed when working with very large files on the order of a GB. Out of GUI editors it seemed to handle such files the best. Used it a lot as a chip designer at Synopsys, the large files in question being RCc extraction netlists. Granted it was kinda buggy, but most of us stuck with it.
  • netllama5 months ago
    My preferred text editor going back to the IRIX days of nedit.
    • mixmastamyk5 months ago
      Yes, loved nedit around the turn of the century. At some point I moved to geany, later combined with micro.
  • Paianni5 months ago
    This is trying to fill the gap between console Unicode editors (e.g mined) and the 'full-fat' editors typically built around GTK or Qt. I'm not too keen they decided to mess around with the Motif File selection dialog to make it more 'Nautilus-like'.
  • zzo38computer5 months ago
    Is the original version available without antialiased text and Unicode? Both are features I specifically do not want.

    (However, the X locale features are not made very well; they could have been done better (for example, it should not require the C library locale to match the X windows locale, but it does, which can cause some locales to not work, as well as other problems; there is also the bug in Xlib (and problems with the distribution) that requires it to be compiled differently for some locales than other locales).)

    • mixmastamyk5 months ago
      Nedit is packaged in most distros.
    • trevithick5 months ago
      Why do you not want those features? What is your use case?
  • satiated_grue5 months ago
    I still use NEdit the same way I use notepad on Windows. Quick work on small ASCII-only files.