Building a DOOM-like multiplayer shooter in pure SQL(cedardb.com)
251 pointsby lvogel4 days ago16 comments
  • a3w4 days ago
    THIS IS MADNESS.

    Krieger, is that you? You went too far with it.

    I am all for catgirl holograms, so good science by Archer's Krieger on that. But SQL should not run Doom. The limits of science have been pushed beyond madness!

    Well okay, "does it run Doom" comes up here frequently.

    But why not solve "does it run catgirls" first, if you are a real-life mad scientist?

    • lelanthran3 days ago
      > Krieger, is that you? You went too far with it.

      Is this a reference to Far Cry 1?

  • pjot3 days ago
    Author of the mentioned DuckDB-DOOM here!

    This is awesome - multiplayer is a great addition. Really like the cone in the mini-map too

    • IncRnd3 days ago
      This is pretty neat. I was expecting a WAD file to get loaded, but this was still pretty neat, even better than Windows XP in JS.
    • lvogel3 days ago
      Love that you liked it! Your project was the inspiration and showed me the insanity was actually feasible :D
  • paulryanrogers3 days ago
    I feel like these more extreme efforts barely qualify as running Doom. Technically I guess it's Doom in pure SQL, not running on it (since that suggests hardware).

    Other efforts such as Doom (like) CAPTCHA or Doom in TypeScript types are either so incomplete, unplayable, or so absurdly abstract that it strikes me as desperate cries for attention.

    That said, people have all kinds of weird interests, so to each their own. I'd just prefer these absurd efforts didn't take up so much attention that they distract from artistic efforts with more to say than "look what I can do". Even some other efforts in Doom; like "Thatcher's Techbase", "Kriegsland: Blutorden", "Blades of Agony", or HDoom.

  • romperstomper3 days ago
    I'd say this is more like Wolfenstein 3D :)
    • lvogel3 days ago
      That's just my age showing, I guess. For me, all 2.5D shooters are DOOMlikes. I was actually first thinking about calling it a Quake-like since IMHO that is much more well known for its multiplayer, but then I never got around to implement powerups and all the other stuff people might have expected.
      • boxed3 days ago
        DOOM was revolutionary because it switched from raycasting like Wolfenstein to a binary tree rendering system that allowed much more complex architecture.

        If it's using raycasting, it's not DOOM-like...

    • to11mtm3 days ago
      tbh feels like OG Wolf crossed with some early text based 'first person' RPG crossed with real time updates...

      I suppose if there's one frustration it's that various 8/16bit dooms are out there including asciidoom and wondering why the better UX/vis of those weren't a thing...

    • gs173 days ago
      For some reason it's really common to call this kind of project a "Doom clone" despite it not having the features that made Doom notable at the time. Honestly, it's impressive enough that it doesn't need to be tied to being a "[90s game] clone".
      • dspillett3 days ago
        There was a time when any FPS game was referred to as a Doom-a-like or Doom clone. Heck, eventually even tihngs with a first person view but no shooting, or that pre-dated Doom (Doom was a step change in a few ways but it certainly wasn't the first FPS, I remember some more primative attempts as far back as the mid-to-late 80s). The current referring-to-everything-as-a-doom-clone is basically an extension of that.
    • YeGoblynQueenne2 days ago
      I'd say it's more like Angband.
  • lvogel4 days ago
    If you want to take a look at the source code, here's the repo! https://github.com/cedardb/DOOMQL
  • esafak4 days ago
    This is a clever ad! I had not heard of them so I looked up the technology behind it: https://cedardb.com/docs/technology/

    A Postgresql-compatible HTAP. It appears to be single server and closed source. Roadmap: https://cedardb.com/docs/roadmap/

    • FridgeSeal3 days ago
      IIUC its a commercialisation of a research DB called Umbra which has some pretty amazing performance characteristics.
    • zekrioca3 days ago
      Would this multiplayer work on Postgresql?
      • ChrisWint3 days ago
        Depends on what you mean by "works" I guess. The statements all look like PostgreSQL SQL and should, therefore, all work. That said, they are pretty heavy duty, especially the recursive Ray tracing, so I expect it to lag quite a bit.
  • boredinstapanda3 days ago
    Reminds me of the text mode Doom before the ASCII mode video drivers.

    I couldn't find the site after a quick search,maybe the wayback machine.

  • dspillett3 days ago
    In Pure SQL [caveat in super-fast TV advert disclaimer voice: if you define “pure SQL” as including 150 lines of Python for the main game loop and input processing]

    Though doing all the game state updates and rendering in SQL is impressive.

  • valorzard3 days ago
    Feel like the logical extreme of this is a database built for multiplayer games, something like: https://github.com/clockworklabs/SpacetimeDB

    Though there, you are still writing the main game logic in Rust or C#

    • crooked-v3 days ago
      "Just build all the logic directly in the DB" is something I've thought about before for simple multiplayer online RPGs and the like, where quite a lot of things are effectively just a direct mapping from database to screen. But, using the general idea for 'twitch' gaming is really wild.
    • lvogel3 days ago
      Yea, I actually thought of the viability of SQL for games while working on DOOMQL. It's just so easy to express a lot of game logic in SQL queries. As an avid OSRS player I was thinking about doing a simple MUD/MMO next.

      Thanks for the pointer to SpacetimeDB - haven't heard of it before!

      • all23 days ago
        My understanding is that Spacetime db embeds the "system" component of an ECS into a DB. The rest of the ECS is in there too.

        I briefly looked into it, but never got past that fundamental piece.

  • ant6n3 days ago
    It’s a very cool accomplishment. As a nerd of early shooters, I do wonder whether it’s fair to call it Doom-like. It’s clearly more untextured Wolfenstein 3d.

    Are we sufficiently far from 1993 to just “round” it all to being Doom-like? certainly it’s better for eyeballs.

    • johnisgood3 days ago
      Yeah, it is definitely Wolfenstein 3D in my opinion. Many Doom-clones are. Maybe Wolfenstein 3D is a Doom-clone in itself? I dunno, I do not know the history. Can anyone enlighten me?
      • nemomarx3 days ago
        Wolfenstein came first, Doom followed from the same team. While some doom clones at the time continued to use the Wolfenstein engine it was fairly brief. Rise of the triad is I think the most impressive one using basically the Wolfenstein model?
        • int_19ha day ago
          Catacomb 3D (also by id Software) came first. Wolfenstein 3D was a further development of the same tech that happened to be much more popular, hence why people mostly remember that.

          As I recall there were a few games using a similar engine at the time, it's just that they didn't left much of an impression. Some examples would be Blake Stone and Corridor 7.

        • jandrese3 days ago
          Depends where you want to draw the line. You could trace the lineage all the way back to Rogue with its grid map where the player is fixed to the grid and moves in full block increments. Then you had those 3D maze games where you were still on the grid and stuck moving in cardinal directions, but you got a 3D representation of the area. Then Wolfenstein allowed the player to move freely on the same grid map. Finally Doom (finally!) dispensed with the grid and made the map out of vectors.
          • wduquette3 days ago
            Not knocking your history, but I gotta say that Wolfenstein-3D was like nothing I'd ever seen...and I played the original Wolfenstein on the Apple II--and the original Wizardry as well, which is a lot more to the point than Rogue IMHO. The Wizardry map grid and the Wolfenstein-3D map grid are really similar, now that I think about it.
    • omoikane3 days ago
      Part of the brilliance of Doom has got to be this short one-syllable name, so all later games that did raycasting would call themselves "Doom-like" as opposed to "Wolfenstein-like". The latter is just too many syllables.
  • ForHackernews3 days ago
    There's also pg_doom that runs Doom as a Postgres extension https://github.com/DreamNik/pg_doom arguably less impressive because PG extensions can be normal(ish) C.
  • flykespice3 days ago
    The previous trend was about trying to run DOOM on as many constrained devices as possible

    now it has evolved to trying to prove turing-completeness on the least places you'd expect it to be.

  • 3 days ago
    undefined
  • OhMeadhbh3 days ago
    "Programming languages differ not so much in what they make possible, but in what they make easy."
  • phoenixhaber3 days ago
    I once made a doom emulator with a bandsaw and a pile of toothpicks but unfortunately I had difficulties cross compiling to a dumpster fire of banana peels.
  • alexchantavy3 days ago
    Do it in Neo4j now lmao