32 pointsby earayu5 months ago4 comments
  • cipherself5 months ago
    In the list of features, it mentions:

    > vision-based search for comprehensive document understanding

    but it's not clear to me what this means, is it just vector embeddings for each image in every document via a CLIP-like model?

    In addition, I'd be curious what's the rationale behind using the plethora of databases, given the docs on running it in production spins them all up, I assume they're all required, for instance I'd be curious on the trade-offs between using postgres with something like pg_search (for bm25 support, which vanilla postgres FTS doesn't have) vs using both postgres and ElasticSearch.

    The docs are also very minimal, I'd have loved to see at least 1 example of usage.

  • davidcox1435 months ago
    Congrats on the launch. How does it compare to HelixDB?

    https://github.com/HelixDB/helix-db

    • CharlesW5 months ago
      HelixDB is a database. ApeRAG is an application that uses multiple databases (but that not particular one). Hypothetically, you could fork ApeRAG and modify it to use that database.
  • srameshc5 months ago
    > ApeRAG requires PostgreSQL, Redis, Qdrant, and Elasticsearch. You have two options:

    > bash ./02-install-database.sh # Deploys PostgreSQL, Redis, Qdrant, Elasticsearch

    Is this built on top of all databases ? I am just trying to understand.

    • earayu5 months ago
      Yes, ApeRAG uses all these databases.
      • spott5 months ago
        What does it use for the graph part? Elasticsearch? A Postgres plugin?
  • GloriousMEEPT5 months ago
    > bash ./02-install-database.sh # Deploys PostgreSQL, Redis, Qdrant, Elasticsearch

    geez

    sorry but, how much SHIT is it going to take to make AI good?

    • earayu5 months ago
      Maintaining databases is painful, so ApeRAG uses kubeblocks for all these databases.
    • cpursley5 months ago
      What’s funny is Postgres alone can handle this entire workload decently well.
      • CuriouslyC5 months ago
        Postgres isn't a replacement for elastic. You CAN get full text search working in postgres, and for very basic use cases it's good enough, but it's vastly inferior to elastic in terms of features and performance.
        • freakynit5 months ago
          Exactly. These "extensions".. they are good, but, far from being replacements for dedicated products, the quality of which customers have come to expect.
    • popalchemist5 months ago
      This is a very typical, and pretty bare-bones stack. Almost any production grade webapp above a minimal threshold of complexity will have database, cache, and search.
      • fishmicrowaver5 months ago
        This is just one of a million other wrappers around AI that will be forgotten in a few months.
        • popalchemist5 months ago
          Yes, and that doesn't change the fact that the stack is typical.