So the way this works is, when you make a claim, and someone else denies the claim, to convince people you present some evidence. Merely repeating the claim makes us think that you don't have any, or that you're too lazy to look it up.
You made the claim. Defending the claim is your job.
You mean the problems with "activist teachers" trying to insert religious indoctrination into the education process? Yes, that is an issue that needs to be worked on.
Wow. I am extremely interested in having dialog "across the aisle", but there so much passive aggressive anger in that screed that it ironically borders on its own form of religious fundamentalism.
I'd be foolish enough to try a conversation there but it seems comparable to trying to persuade a devout person of faith to abandon their church.