115 pointsby wstrange2 days ago18 comments
  • danielodievich2 days ago
    The Economist's Scam Inc podcast (mentioned elsewhere in this discussion too) has fascinating (and very troubling) insights into this.

    I have sons heading to college this and next year and I have tried to prepare them for the world of scamming that exists out there. I sure hope I've done enough.

    Just a few minutes ago I had a scam text that pig butchering begins. I typically delete them immediately but this time just to see what happens I wrote back in several languages aggressively counter-offering to teach them how to buy crypto. I got a puzzled response, then a picture of a waifish asian woman on restaraunt balcony, I think it's AI generated, but it doesn't matter, and then after me clearly not biting a "Fuck you". I wrote "I feel for you doing pig butchering, but its not going to work here", translated it to Chinese and sent that, and got back another "Fuck you", this time in Chinese. ... Now that I typed this out, I realize this was kind of pointless exchange

    • dghlsakjg2 days ago
      Your kids are far more likely to fall for dumb shit their friends talk them into than random texts.

      They will be, or already have been, exposed to people telling them that crypto/leveraged day trading/AI/whatever is the shortcut to wealth. That will likely be their peers, or the people (podcasters) that have high status amongst their peers, and is a much more insidious problem. That's what will get them into trouble.

      • busterarm2 days ago
        I hate online scammers to my core -- weird reason too.

        A guy I knew back in high school was notorious for falling for 419 type scams all the time. His brothers would constantly dunk on him for being scammed online. It was like 7, 8, 9 times...

        Years later he was caught on TV by Chris Hansen and charged. Went to prison. That recontextualized everything. He wasn't falling for scams -- that was a fiction to cover the fact that he was being repeatedly blackmailed by people who caught on to his activities online.

        It makes me extremely angry to think that people knew what he was up to and let him continue just so they could keep getting evidence against him to blackmail him again and again. Fucking furious, honestly.

        • dghlsakjg18 hours ago
          Its far more concerning that online scammers are more effective than police at finding pedophiles, and in fact the only reason the dude did get caught by the police was as part of a copaganda collaboration with a major media company.

          Policing in the US is pretty highly paid profession. We should expect more competent results from them

          • busterarm17 hours ago
            Truly agree with you, especially with all the details that came out in his case.

            His fucking email was pied_piper<local area code>@aol.com for fucks sake.

    • alyandon2 days ago
      You wasted their time delaying them moving on to someone else. Mission accomplished.
      • 2 days ago
        undefined
  • os2warpman2 days ago
    This is an earnest request. Please help me understand the mindset of people who fall for pig butchering scams.

    The thought of giving money to a stranger who I met via a dating app or other social media platform who shifted the conversation to WeChat and asked me to wire money to a bank account is so incomprehensible to me that the mind of someone who would do that is entirely different to how mine is constructed physically, chemically, and electrically to such a degree that it is difficult for me to even believe that it exists.

    I am not even particularly financially literate. In college. I barely scraped by my statistics class, took no finance or business classes, and the only formal financial literacy education I have ever received was a single one hour course given to me by the US Army in late 2001 when they announced the TSP (401k for military) was coming where the only takeaways were “compounding interest is magic” and “put your money into a retirement account and don’t look at it until you’re a decade out from retirement”.

    To me, believing an unsolicited stranger who is offering you an investment opportunity like what pig butchering scams are will make you rich is the same exact thing as walking out of a rundown gas station that also sells nunchucks, bongs, and ninja throwing stars with a little baggie of pills that have a tiger on the label thinking that they’ll turn you a super sex machine.

    Is it desperation?

    Profound financial illiteracy that exceeds mine by several orders of magnitude?

    • bag_boy2 days ago
      I am happy to share my mom's story, as tragic as it is.

      My stepfather passed away just before Covid. After he passed away, my mom was isolated and started spending time on Match.com.

      Eventually she found her match - a total scamming operation.

      She proceeded to liquidate my deceased step father's retirement savings and also took out high interest loans to send her match money.

      She wired the scammer well over $100k. The high interest loans totally ruined her life.

      They were using a US bank. She was using Wells Fargo.

      She is/was:

      1. Desperate for attention 2. Prone to deception 3. Tech illiterate - some of the photos the scammer sent her were so obviously photoshopped

      Happy to share more if it's helpful. It's been one of the most difficult things to deal with throughout my life, but I hope that our story can be helpful to someone else.

      • os2warpman2 days ago
        I think I understand. Thank you and I'm sorry.
      • busterarm2 days ago
        You don't even have to be tech illiterate.

        A former roommate of mine who is extremely tech-savvy but just fat and lonely was constantly wiring women he'd never met money.

        He was constantly getting catfished on dating apps and talking all day to fake facebook profiles 2-3 hours away and they'd always have an excuse to not meet him and have their hand out for escalating amounts of money until reality hit him and he'd start over and do it again with another catfish. I moved out partly because he would miss his mortgage payments because he wired some scammer money.

    • jabroni_salad2 days ago
      I do think social desperation is real and does a number on some people. There are people out there in the world who will enter fairy tale love story mode if the right sequence of words reaches them as if they were some kind of self destructive sleeper agent.

      A lot of these people lived decent rational lives and should know better. They are college educated and had good careers and large retirement accounts and made all the right financial decisions to lead a good life. But then some stranger pretends to misdial your number and reads a script about how they feel like they really connected with you. You get 'activated' and enter an irrational universe where you can be convinced to send your money away and keep the relationship a secret from everyone you know and lie to your bank about why you are withdrawing anything and who knows what else.

      I like to think I am immune to this but who knows what I will be in 30 years. I make a living by being distrusting (security) and got activated as a good boglehead at a really young age. Or maybe the stupid-juice will suffuse my brain at age 70 and I'll give it all away to a cute AI voice that robodials me after decades of not answering any call that isn't already in my contacts, and everybody who knows me will be mystified as to why, including myself.

    • nemomarx2 days ago
      They butter you up for a long while before they get to the offer - that's the distinction from normal scams. They act as a friend and confidant for weeks, maybe flirt, and when the pig is "raised" they move to the slaughtering process

      so it's not a stranger, it's "your close online friend says they have a good retirement fund and it might do better than yours, would you try it out?"

    • tim3332 days ago
      I chatted a bit to one of them trying to get money from me and it was quite subtle. Blah blah I make money in crypto why don't you try I'll show you what to do and then instead of going to say mexc which is a real exchange it would be to mexx or some such which is a clone they've made. It would actually semi function and show profits encouraging the punter to stake more not realizing it was a fake exchange.

      I didn't send money to the mexx.com site but I did send some to a site called ftx.com which pulled a more subtle scam. Got that refunded eventually.

    • schmookeeg2 days ago
      The Economist has an interesting podcast about this phenomenon called Scam Inc. You need to be a subscriber to hear more than the first few eps, but they were interesting and went into this situation in detail. Worth a listen to understand this crime and its nuance a little better.
      • saltcured2 days ago
        Hah, this is too close to the joke that popped into my head:

        Sure, we can explain how this works, you just need to subscribe to our educational series on the topic...

        It's all about framing the con in a way that gets past the defense mechanisms the OP assumes. Whether this is done with synthetic intimacy, urgency, exclusivity, high-mindedness, etc. depends on the target victim profile.

        But, it's always social engineering. The only 100% defense is to assume a deeply untrusting posture that makes social living nearly impossible.

        • schmookeeg2 days ago
          haha, it's getting dystopian isn't it? At some point you end up letting your guard down just to be a human again -- it's all so exhausting.

          While I've been an Econ subscriber in the past when magazines were a thing, the podcast didn't con me into subscribing. _this time_ But I enjoyed their free eps all the same.

    • 2 days ago
      undefined
    • rikthevik2 days ago
      The Beatles had it right with Eleanor Rigby.

      "All the lonely people, where do they all come from? All the lonely people, where do they all belong?"

      There are a lot of sad people out there. And some of them are at the nunchucks, bongs, and throwing stars store.

    • jowea2 days ago
      Maybe it's trusting a personal connection and word of mouth over mainstream information because of some vague anti-establishment feelings? I also don't know really. I mean, even a small bank CEO fell for one https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/cryptocurrenc...
    • QuantumGood2 days ago
      There is a kind of threshold in most humans where we assume we are dealing with someone who "feels like" they are (real and) in our circle of contacts. Once this threshold is passed, critical thinking as to who this person is/what their motivation is moves to a much lower priority.
    • rightbyte2 days ago
      I think you are looking at it from the wrong direction. The scammers are calling everyone.

      Of those you have met, who would be at risk of falling for such scams? I know about maybe two.

      And the combination of being both susceptible and not chronic broke is quite rare. Both those I know about who I guess fall for this stuff are broke.

      • PaulHoule2 days ago
        By "everyone" I'd say that if any social or comms platform allows DMs you will get messages that say something like like "Hey!" from those scammers. If you reply you will get questions meant to qualify you like "How old are you?" pretty quick and if you pass they'll work you over for months

        Young folks on the other hand get hit with

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sextortion

        which often ends by suicide in 15-20 minutes.

      • fragmede2 days ago
        To be fair, if Troy Hunt, who's made his career in cybersecurity can get scammed, thinking you're too smart to ever fall for a scam is just pure hubris.
        • rightbyte2 days ago
          If am referring to pig butchering scams, not phising attacks or scams in general.

          I would e.g. instantly enter my username and password at work into any prompt that requests and looks as usual since Microsoft request my system password randomly all the time theough webpages. It is not my fault...

    • rectang2 days ago
      Please help me to understand the urge to blame pig butchering on pigs rather than on butchers.
    • lesuorac2 days ago
      > The thought of giving money to a stranger who I met via a dating app or other social media platform

      The thought of telling somebody your real name to somebody online used to be considered a poor decision.

      The bar has really moved for what people need for trust.

    • hedora2 days ago
      If you target 100,000 people, a 0.01% response rate ends up being a lot of money.
    • SpicyLemonZest2 days ago
      The trick is that they don't feel like an unsolicited stranger. The stories you read about these scams summarize away weeks or months of talking, flirting, maybe falling in love a little bit, until they're not a stranger but your very cute and very rich friend.

      What does work is an absolute, ironclad rule that I do not trust and am not friends with anyone I meet online until we've met multiple times in person. But there's a lot of lonely people out there who don't find that rule so easy.

      • 0cf8612b2e1e2 days ago
        I think of it like the xz backdoor. A long time investment of goodwill over months before you tighten the noose.

        The more sophisticated attempts seemingly do not straight up ask for cash. They offer an investment opportunity on a scam website which will report the investment doing well, so the victim will independently invest more money.

      • JTbane2 days ago
        >What does work is an absolute, ironclad rule that I do not trust and am not friends with anyone I meet online until we've met multiple times in person

        That's a good rule and should be common sense for all internet users.

    • burkaman2 days ago
      It is also incomprehensible to most victims, before and even after it happens to them. Many people never report the crime because they're so embarrassed and cannot explain their own behavior. If you talk to them about it they usually won't defend their decisions, they'll say something like "I know it doesn't make sense, I don't understand why I did it and I see now that the scam is blindingly obvious, I don't know what happened".

      Desperation and loneliness are often a part of it, and these scams happen over a period of months, so at the critical moment it doesn't feel (emphasis on "feel") like you're talking to a stranger at all. These criminal organizations have done this thousands and thousands of times, they know how to emotionally manipulate someone away from thinking objectively about the situation. They just have to catch someone at a vulnerable moment and get them talking for a day or two, and already they aren't a stranger anymore, they're "a guy I've been talking to", and they just build up the relationship for weeks or months before they even bring up money or investing.

      This Economist podcast is pretty good if you want to understand more, even if you don't have a subscription the three free episodes are great: https://www.economist.com/audio/podcasts/scam-inc.

      This is also a good blog post about how even someone extremely knowledgeable about technology and fraud can be easily scammed if you just catch them at the right time: https://pluralistic.net/2024/02/05/cyber-dunning-kruger/. It can happen to you too, you are not immune just because these victims seem like morons to you. They seem like morons to themselves too, but it still happened.

    • renewiltord2 days ago
      I know two people in my network who this happened to. One is the elderly father of a friend who has dementia who was told that his friend in Asia had a business opportunity (they actually collected this money in person in San Jose). The other is a young woman whose mother is a member of the CCP (as many in China are) and who was told that she had to do this or her mother would face consequences there.

      I found both situations unbelievable but I can see how. Two situations which turned out legitimate were:

      * I was in a bad accident and there was a settlement which was intended to go to the insurer but went to me instead. The subrogation claim eventually made it to me and I was informed via phone. I told them to send the docs etc. and contacted the insurer to ensure this was their guys. It was and I paid (perhaps more than I should have but not all that I received)

      * About half the time I send a big wire on Chase, they call me to confirm details and this and that. I always say "I shouldn't really be doing this, right? Can you tell me how I can call you?" and they tell me to go on the site and find the number etc. etc.

      So it seems there are many cases where the fake seeming is legit. These two were drowned in a large number of other scam phone calls, admittedly, and I must confess that hearing an Indian accent with a Western name now sets off my alarm bells.

    • throwawayq34232 days ago
      > This is an earnest request. Please help me understand the mindset of people who fall for pig butchering scams.

      Same logic behind AI girlfriends or in general losing yourself to online life. It's a lack meeting your needs offline and scammers/technology willing to fill those needs online.

    • anonnon2 days ago
      I've only heard of "pig butchering" scams in the context of people who pose as family/friends of people on social media whom they target with urgent requests for money, e.g.:

      > I've been arrested/kidnapped/lost my wallet

      the scammers create a flase sense of urgency and exploit the victim's concern for their loved one's well-being.

      • toast02 days ago
        IMHO, that's not really 'pig butchering', that's another category; FTC calls it 'family emergency scamming'.

        To me, pig butchering is a long term process where the victim is convinced that a new contact is a trusted friend, and then the trusted friend needs money for (transportation, investment, living arrangements, etc). The symbolism being that the victim is a pig that is fattened up via building up a relationship, and then butchered via the demand for money.

    • HNUltraCensored2 days ago
      [dead]
    • bigbacaloa2 days ago
      [dead]
    • bigbacaloa2 days ago
      [dead]
  • supportengineer2 days ago
    I thought that US banks had to know their customers
    • unboxingelf2 days ago
      KYC only hurts law abiding citizens.

      Criminals just use stolen identities (from breaches of KYC data).

      • adrr2 days ago
        Depends on the level of KYC. If you're just doing social and birthdate, its easy to bypass. You could add additional checks like check phone and email which are readily available from data brokers. You could send a physical mail to the address in the credit report with a PIN. It depends on level of the level friction you want your KYC program to go. When I built a KYC at a neobank, we focused more on verifying that you were in the US. We could detect proxies and if you make the signup in a mobile app, you can pin the cert which will stop automated attacks. We relied on fingerprinting devices but a lot of methods don't work due to mobile OS providers cracking down on them.
      • mouse_2 days ago
        Gotta love anarcho tyranny
        • downrightmike2 days ago
          I had to look it up: The term "anarcho-tyranny" was coined by writer Sam Francis to describe a situation where a state oppresses citizens' lives but is unable or unwilling to enforce laws that protect them. Francis believed that anarcho-tyranny is built into the managerial system and cannot be solved by voting out incumbents or fighting corruption. He argued that the political left has dominated politics because of a progressive managerial class that has increased state power and bureaucratization, while eroding the power of other authorities. Francis believed that the only way to restore sanity was to devolve power back to law-abiding citizens. Francis also used the term to describe an armed dictatorship without rule of law. Some commentators have used the term to describe situations where governments focus on confiscating weapons instead of stopping looters. Thomas Fleming has described anarcho-tyranny as "law without order" and suggested that people should follow the advice of a boxing referee and protect themselves at all times.

          But in reality it was the right that was setting us up for failure all this time, going back to at least Reagan as California's governor reducing funding to schools. Then Nixon doubled down.

          • Whoppertime2 days ago
            https://www.cato.org/blog/new-k-12-productivity-chart It's hard to believe that education is getting less funding. There seems to be a perception that spending more money on education will result in smarter students or higher test scores but that doesn't seem to be the case. There is more money spent on educating children through K-12. Also Richard Nixon was president before Ronald Reagan so Nixon wouldn't be able to double down on his successors policies. Unless you mean Governor Ronald Reagan who started his leadership in 1967 with Nixon's presidency starting in 1969
          • tantalor2 days ago
            The best defense to scams is to not fall for scams.
            • throwaway484762 days ago
              The best defense to scams is maintaining a high trust society.
              • mouse_19 hours ago
                I'm having trouble understanding exactly what it is you're trying to say. Could you elaborate?
                • throwaway4847611 hours ago
                  For thousands of years western societies executed or exiled troublemakers. This created the selective pressure that led to high trust society.
          • fallingknife2 days ago
            The left has done more damage you our education system by removing standards and getting rid of separate schools for the smartest students than the right ever could by cutting funding. Most recently in California they got rid of calculus class in high school. Meanwhile we continue to increase spending and are near the highest in the world and our education system is trash https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator/cmd/education-exp...
            • supportengineer2 days ago
              Rest assured, California high school students can still take calculus, in fact they can even take "AP" courses
            • downrightmike2 days ago
              Bush2 started no child left behind before that.
      • throwawayq34232 days ago
        They don't if they don't have to.
    • coderatlarge2 days ago
      US banks are too busy delaying their customers’ ach transfers for days so they can profit from the float to actually solve customer problems and take responsibility for the many societal benefits they enjoy.
      • supportengineer2 days ago
        I recently tried to write a check from Mom & Pop's Yeehaw Bank to a major name bank. They put a FIVE DAY hold on it.
        • coderatlarge2 days ago
          i recently wrote a check to another member of the same credit union. they deposited the check to their credit union account. the credit union insisted on a ten day hold!!
          • testing223212 days ago
            I’m 43 and have never written a cheque in my life. Utterly useless things when you have good customer centric regulations.
            • It’s easy to avoid checks if you don’t mind paying transaction fees
              • testing22321a day ago
                Never paid a transaction fee. I can put money into any account I have the number of right now , free.

                Australia and Canada.

            • coderatlargea day ago
              we resorted to checks because we hit a non-transparent zelle limit which is not documented anywhere.
              • testing2232119 hours ago
                Never used Zelle or paid a transaction fee.
                • coderatlarge8 hours ago
                  if you ever need to transfer money across far enough borders from your home, it’s currently almost impossible to avoid paying some sort of fee afaik (whether an airplane ticket to hand-carry cash or some kind of markup to convert currencies or some sort of blockchain fee to use newer methods). i’m actively looking for methods that are legal and don’t carry a fee. ex ibkr currency convert -> fidelity individual account -> fidelity cash mgmt -> free wire ?? there are all sorts of gotchas at every step atm ostensibly for aml or sanctions “compliance“
      • 0cf8612b2e1e2 days ago
        I honestly want slower transactions as a service. If I get hacked, my accounts are going to be drained in milliseconds. Instead, I want specific accounts to have a minimum N days to money extraction. Lots of time for me to be able to put a halt on unexpected money movement.
        • coderatlarge2 days ago
          the number of financial institutions that don’t offer yubikey (or any hsm) support shocks me. ditto lockdown mode.

          on delays “for security reasons “, see my other comment above about 10 day holds on funds that hsd anyway been at that credit union for months.

      • dgfitz2 days ago
        Don't know if this is true, but I read this a few years ago, top answer: https://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/comments/se51wb/e...
        • Tadpole91812 days ago
          I've seen a "pay me a few bucks and I'll do it instantly", so pretty sure it's not a technical issue. It's a "we can charge a few bucks if we don't fix it" issue.
          • quesera2 days ago
            Definitely not a technical limitation.

            ACH clearing (transaction information) happens multiple times per day. Originating bank sends a list of transactions to the clearing house, Receiving bank is notified of transaction pending.

            ACH settlement (bank-bank funds transfer) happens overnight. Funds from the Originating bank are "rehomed" to the Federal Reserve, and then again to the Receiving bank. This is, obviously, a database update.

            ACH posting (funds available to customer) happens whenever the Receiving bank feels it's appropriate. Generally, by local close of business on the settlement lot schedule (same day or next day). The receiver may choose to delay posting to customer account if they don't trust the Originator, or the customer, or just for fun.

            ACH transactions are reversible. This is the reason posting happens as quickly as it does (!), but also the reason posting takes as long as it does.

          • fredfish2 days ago
            I had a bank VP tell me Bill Clinton fixed the US' deficit by moving tax settling to be immediate on them. The strings of my little fiddle broke.
    • dfxm122 days ago
      The banks have some responsibility here, and the article brings this up. The banks' response involved saying they can't keep up with volume and shifts blame to social media for some reason.

      You gotta understand, there's the law, then there's enforcement of laws, then there's punishments for getting caught breaking the law. The banks have done the math. Maybe they've even lobbied to have the penalties/enforcers reduced. It doesn't pay for them to follow this law strictly, so they don't. You'll find this across the legal system. It comes down hard on the poor and marginalized, but gives a lot of grace to the rich, even if at our expense.

    • 2 days ago
      undefined
  • djoldman2 days ago
    AMLKYC always seemed obviously backward or ridiculous to me. The fact that banks are essentially tasked with enforcing laws is... a crutch to say the least.

    Analogies are by definition imperfect but:

    1. why not point the finger at ATT and Verizon for allowing phone calls and IP packets that facilitated crime?

    2. toll road owners, car/truck manufacturers, UPS, USPS, should they be tasked with "knowing" more about their customers?

    All this just ends up blaming the victim and doesn't really fix the problem while having massive collateral damage like folks having their bank accounts closed for no good reason and causing real losses to actual businesses.

    What's the solution? I'm not sure. Perhaps it begins with holding countries more to account for the actions of their resident criminals.

    • dfxm122 days ago
      The government gives plenty of help to banks. I don't think their role here is unreasonable. The solution is to tighten/enforce regulations around bank accounts & make the penalties mean something. Two wrongs don't make a right. If you see something, say something. If you think telecoms are doing something wrong, write to the FCC. Bring up SIM hijacking for me. If you think toll road owners are doing something wrong, bring it up with them and maybe the FHWA.
    • throwaway484762 days ago
      This is what happens when a high trust society suddenly comes into contact with a low trust society. The systems that worked fine can't keep up with the scale of fraud.
  • 2 days ago
    undefined
  • seatac762 days ago
    So pig butchering based out of SEA is now the dominant scam form? It’s crazy how quickly this came to dominate the landscape.
    • IncreasePosts2 days ago
      Probably having AI increases the efficiency of this operation substantially, since it is heavily personalized and requires a lot of long term, non-paying effort on the part of the scammer . Either from directly replying to messages, or from automatically developing dossiers from victims social media profiles so you know what topics get them going.
  • csense2 days ago
    > In October, the U.K. began requiring banks to reimburse scam victims up to £85,000, or about $116,000, per claim when they make a fraudulent payment on behalf of their customers, even if the customers authorized the transfer.

    How does the bank verify the scammer and the "victim" aren't colluding?

    I.e. Mal opens a bank account with $100k, it gets cleaned out when he's "scammed" by Eve, then Mal is reimbursed $100k. Mal & Eve collectively start with $100k, and end up with $200k.

    (This is why I put "victim" in quotes: In this scenario, Eve and Mal are co-conspirators trying to defraud the scam reimbursement system.)

    • ljm2 days ago
      They’re pretty on-the-ball with fraud. People are commonly scammed into being a money mule (basically being sent money and then being asked to send it on to another account, with the promise of payment) and they get locked out.

      They’re not going to just take your word at being scammed, either, and the police are going to be involved for it to even get off the ground.

      To add to that - there are several barriers to taking out large amounts of cash. You can’t just walk into a bank and pull out £10k, no questions asked, because of the likelihood of it being part of a scam.

    • rafram2 days ago
      Yeah, but the scammer could also just walk into the bank and pass the teller a note telling them to hand over all the money in the drawer. They'd do it! But it would be theft and the scammer would be arrested, just like if they did what you're suggesting.
      • weird-eye-issue2 days ago
        It's cute if you really think that

        These days you can open bank accounts completely online with fraudulent info

        You can even open bank accounts from countries on the other side of the world. How will they arrest you, exactly?

        • tim3332 days ago
          They won't "reimburse scam victims" on the other side of the world. They are probably reluctant to reimburse at all unless you are some granny in Croydon making a fuss in the newspapers.
        • rafram2 days ago
          It's on the bank to prevent those other-side-of-the-world account holders from sending large sums of money to untrusted destinations in the first place.
          • Good luck with that. Contracts etc can be falsified. You'd just end up locking out real people from sending their own money for legitimate reasons in the name of attempting to stop fraud or in your words "untrusted destinations" whatever that means.
    • pjc502 days ago
      Like the real scams, this does require that Mal be overseas in some place where they can't easily be traced. And of course if the money ever comes back to Eve's bank account, someone might notice. So this requires quite a complicated setup which is hard to achieve between people in different countries because .. one might scam the other.
    • tim3332 days ago
      The reimbursing thing is quite new and at least one of the parties has to be UK resident to get UK compensation. That would leave the UK resident at risk of jail. Usually the scammers like to be somewhere well offshore.
    • fallingknife2 days ago
      Even if the customer authorized the transaction? So now all the customers have to pay higher fees to cover for idiots getting scammed. Is the Bank of England going to start refunding people who get scammed out of cash under the mattress?
    • tantalor2 days ago
      Ummm, am I the only one who thinks if it was not an authorized payment, I expect 100% recompense, not limited to £85k.
    • hombre_fatal2 days ago
      Fwiw the word “colluding” already describes why victim was emphasized.
    • nikanj2 days ago
  • tempodox2 days ago
    On the side of the banks, whatever happened to KYC?
    • 2 days ago
      undefined
  • 2 days ago
    undefined
  • throwaway484762 days ago
    This will continue to happen until all foreign transactions are insured and reversible.
  • busterarm2 days ago
    If you pick the right credit union, your experience will truly be so much better.

    Even one as big as NFCU. I've never looked back since switching.

  • mschuster912 days ago
    I've said it before here, I'll say it again: it is high time that our governments follow the money and the scammers. Sanction the source countries of these scams to hell and beyond until they clean up their act and pray in front of us on their knees for forgiveness. And yes, I'd like particularly Narendra Modi to kneel - it's hard to wish anything else after watching more than two Scammer Payback videos. Obviously Indian police is aware of what's going on, he's posted more than enough proof, but mysteriously the callcenters get warned in time and vanish.

    The US alone loses 158 billion $ each year [1] to scams, the global toll is allegedly around 1 trillion $ [2]. That's fucking insane, this has to stop.

    [1] https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/ftc-states-scams-cost-us-cons...

    [2] https://www.gasa.org/post/global-state-of-scams-report-2024-...

    • coredog642 days ago
      Every dollar in scam damages verified by the FBI is one fewer work visa for anyone from that country. India is now in a hole of 1 billion (or 10,000 lakhs) work visas, and the latter are more valuable than scams.
      • 2 days ago
        undefined
    • throwawayoldie2 days ago
      > it is high time that our governments follow the money and the scammers

      I suspect the reason they don't is many of them know that following the money will lead right to their own front doors.

    • commandlinefan2 days ago
      > Sanction the source countries

      According to the article, this is originating in China - we're sanctioning them pretty hard as it is, and they don't seem to care that much.

      • throwaway484762 days ago
        Usually Chinese but not located in China proper.
      • mschuster912 days ago
        There's more scammers than just Myanmar, North Korea and China, that's why I explicitly mentioned Scammer Payback - he almost exclusively targets Indian scammers and even learned Hindi to understand the background talks of scammers.
    • throwaway484762 days ago
      Scamming is a large fraction of GDP in some countries.
    • anonnon2 days ago
      It's strange how some of these countries don't take action on their own behalf, if only to preserve their international reputation and the reputation of their citizens abroad. India is a great example. Do Indians not realize how much damage they've done to their reputation by allowing scam call centers to flourish? Are they not aware of

      > DO NOT REDEEM

      Imagine Americans living in small towns with few to no Indians, and their only association with Indian accents is someone trying to steal their (or their parents' or granparents') money.

      EDIT: seatac76, your reply got shadowed; perhaps your entire account. Not sure why.

      • keutoi2 days ago
        _Allowing scam call centers to flourish_.

        How much control does an average citizen have over these criminal enterprises? Does an average US citizen know/care/take-action when mercenaries from their country topple governments of other countries? As long as the crime is not visible, they just enjoy fruits of their crimes.

        • anonnon2 days ago
          > How much control does an average citizen have over these criminal enterprises?

          My point was about the government. This phenomenon is large enough that I'm shocked it hasn't openly caused a diplomatic rift between the US and India, and New Delhi should have a vested interested in combating it.

          > when mercenaries from their country topple governments of other countries

          What "mercenaries" are you referring to?

          • keutoi2 days ago
            Why would any country be proactive in combating this? Do you think US will be fair in return? US protects it's people even from International war crimes.

            Mercenaries: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_r...

          • throwaway_4342 days ago
            > This phenomenon is large enough that I'm shocked it hasn't openly caused a diplomatic rift between the US and India, and New Delhi should have a vested interested in combating it.

            It is only large enough to you probably. India has been sanctioned by US in the 90s for doing reciprocal nuclear tests (after China detonated its bomb) and suffered billions of dollars in trade. US gained nothing from the sanctions except to push India into more poverty. It ended up being counter-productive. Even now Trump is threatening India with billions of dollars in trade sanctions that far outweighs anything caused by scams (if you take absolute numbers).

            > What "mercenaries" are you referring to?

            The CIA is currently fuelling and instigating Manipur riots in India by supplying arms and ammunitions to Kuki narco-terrorists. Prior to this we had USAID that was influencing electoral politics within India. Apart from that, we just witnessed regime change operations in Bangladesh where Pro-India Shiekh Hasina was toppled for a Pro-US Jihadi Muhammad Yunus. All of these run the US taxpayers in hundreds of billions of dollars. Far more than any scam conducted by Indian call centers.

            For an average US citizen, sure it feels like a lot, since you guys are at the receiving end. But since you mentioned why US Government is not bringing this up, it is because it pales in comparison to what US Government has done to India over the past 7 decades. India can bring up a lot of counterpoints that will only cause US diplomats to shut up. We haven't even touched on killing of our nuclear scientists. Too many skeletons in their closet.

            • geodel2 days ago
              Do tell about those nuclear scientists. Seems you know quite a bit.
              • anonnon2 days ago
                I believe they're referring to this:

                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homi_J._Bhabha

                > Gregory Douglas, a journalist, conspiracy theorist,[128] forger,[129] and holocaust denier[130] who claimed to have conducted telephone conversations with former CIA operative Robert Crowley in 1993, published a book titled Conversations with the Crow in 2013. According to Douglas, Crowley claimed that the CIA was responsible for assassinating Homi Bhabha and Prime Minister Shastri in 1966, thirteen days apart, to thwart India's nuclear programme.[131]

                Clearly, the GP is completely rational and quite well-informed.

                • throwaway_4343 hours ago
                  > Clearly, the GP is completely rational and quite well-informed.

                  Yep you believe everything under the Sun when it comes to your Governments and institutions, when it has been proven time and time again that they have been involved in regime change ops and covert ops.

                  It is quite evident you don't have any ability to introspect and question your own Government.

                  Also, it is not just Homi J Bhabha we are talking about. There is a list of at least 11 nuclear scientists that died unnatural deaths. These are just nuclear scientists. Total 684 scientists have died unnaturally in just the past 15 years.

                  You can keep dismissing all this as "conspiracy theory" but we all know how the 3-letter agencies operates.

            • anonnon2 days ago
              > India has been sanctioned by US in the 90s for doing reciprocal nuclear tests

              For one year. 14 other countries sanctioned India too.

              > The CIA is currently fuelling and instigating Manipur riots

              I couldn't find anything on this besides articles on Indian/Bangladeshi InfoWars-tier websites.

              > to what US Government has done to India over the past 7 decades

              Like what?

              • throwaway_4343 hours ago
                > For one year. 14 other countries sanctioned India too.

                And what about it? When US sanctions any country, rest of the World follows. It is nothing new.

                > I couldn't find anything on this besides articles on Indian/Bangladeshi InfoWars-tier websites.

                Just google "Daniel Stephen Courney" [1]. Ex-US military. Supplying weapons and drones to Kuki narco-terrorists. It is a CIA op. We have seized US weapons in Manipur. US weapons don't magically reach far-flung Eastern region of India if not for external assistance.

                Also, how does US made M16 rifle find its way into Manipur, India? [2]

                1: https://www.indiatoday.in/india/story/us-man-gifted-drone-ma...

                2: https://english.mathrubhumi.com/news/india/large-cache-of-ar...

                > Like what?

                I don't have patience to give you the list of things US has done that is viewed negatively against India. The topmost being trying to nuke India in 1971, when US allied itself with Islamic dictatorship in Pakistan.

        • throwaway484762 days ago
          India claims to be a democracy.
          • whensean3 hours ago
            Thirty years after the collapse of the Soviet Union, Western countries have successfully transformed ideology to be quite similar to religion by constructing a "democratic" narrative. Religion holds that if you convert to God or Allah, you are right and blessed. The West now believes that what is democratic is right and just. So countries like India can claim to be democratic and thus gain a moral superiority. However, in reality, democracy has little to do with justice, development, and civilization.
      • seatac762 days ago
        [dead]
    • geodel2 days ago
      Ironically or not but I'd imagine Trump would be appropriate person to give a proper dressing down to Modi via Truth Social if not through official channels.

      As in past, the future US dispensation would be far more more decent to disturb peacock like dancing Modi.

    • throwaway_4342 days ago
      > And yes, I'd like particularly Narendra Modi to kneel

      Umm you are targeting the wrong person here. Majority of the scam call centers come from West Bengal, particularly Kolkata. Which is headed by Chief Minister Mamta Banerjee.

      India has a federal structure, with cooperation between Center and States. Similar to USA. Modi just can't invade Kolkata using Indian Armed Forces and dismantle the operations without facing significant legal challenges in the Supreme Court of India.

      West Bengal is a islamo-commie state. Nearly impossible to flip the state electorally for BJP to win (Narendra Modi heads BJP). The state is a stronghold of Mamta Banerjee who heads the TMC party. She came to power after nearly 4 decades of Communist rule.

      • mschuster912 days ago
        First of all, I didn't downvote you, and you provide valuable context, so if the downvoters would care to explain why I would be very happy.

        > India has a federal structure, with cooperation between Center and States. Similar to USA. Modi just can't invade Kolkata using Indian Armed Forces and dismantle the operations without facing significant legal challenges in the Supreme Court of India.

        There are ways in any federal system to force the cooperation of unwilling states. The US, infamously, threatened to withhold federal highway funding unless states raised the minimum drinking age to 21.

        The federal government could also be transparent about hints of scammers they get and explain why the scammers are not being targeted. Particularly when the state in question is run by the opposition, I would expect the federal government party to use this as political ammunition.

        The fact that there is zero such efforts visible leads me to the conclusion that Modi just doesn't give a fuck.

        [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Drinking_Age_...

        • throwaway_4343 hours ago
          > The fact that there is zero such efforts visible leads me to the conclusion that Modi just doesn't give a fuck.

          Modi cares about Indians more than he cares about US citizens. Indians come first. Just like Trump cares about US citizens more than he cares about Indian citizens. So when it comes to protecting Indians from scammers in Kolkata, West Bengal and other islamo-commie places Modi Government has done an excellent job. We get regular messages warning us against scams and even educating us on how these scams work.

          Why doesn't Modi warn US or prevent it from targeting Western citizens? Because Modi has bigger things to worry about when it comes to India itself. If Trump personally asks Modi, then yes there will be a change (depending on how Trump reciprocates for that gesture, especially considering US has back-stabbed India too many times to even count, Modi will be weary).

          > Particularly when the state in question is run by the opposition, I would expect the federal government party to use this as political ammunition.

          And then what? Western institutions demonize Modi and fund regime change operations in India with their unlimited wealth? Modi won't fall into that trap. If your Governments were not so prolific in regime change operations and interfering politically in other Countries, we would have definitely done a lot to fix this issue. Right now, for any non-Western Government, it is like walking on eggshells. We never know what might piss you guys off (even if the step is in your favor) and you unleash your regime change ops in our Country. The best example that comes to my mind is India sending thousands of deportation requests for wanted criminals, terrorists and gangsters who have taken shelter in Canada, US, UK and Australia. Most of those deportation requests were rejected by your Governments. Guess who these scammers work under? Yep you guessed it right! These very same criminals, gangsters, terrorists who have found refuge in your Country.

          There is a lot I can unpack. But I have only provided you with what is the tip of the iceberg.

    • SapporoChris2 days ago
      https://www.worldometers.info/gdp/gdp-by-country/

      The US GDP is more than 27 trillion. If 158 billion is being lost. That's about .6% of the GDP. So, my question is, why does this have to stop? If it is stopped the benefits to the global population seems trivial. I'm sure at the individual level it is devastating. Good luck getting the national government to care about such a small percent.

      • ahmeneeroe-v22 days ago
        This is not a good financial analysis. Nearly any mature company would absolutely pursue 0.6% in cost reduction. That is a huge, juicy target.
      • jgeada2 days ago
        Because scams destroy trust in institutions, and trust in US institutions is already worryingly low. Without trust in institutions the system collapses.
      • bikecuck22 days ago
        "The total happiness in the world increased"
  • jmclnx2 days ago
    >A huge portion of such fraud is transacted in cryptocurrency.

    Yet another reason to avoid cryptocurrency, until that is 100% fully regulated, I will always avoid it.

    One of the biggest reason is every tom, dick or harry is creating their own cryptocurrency these days. Including the dummy in charge of the US :)

    • darth_avocado2 days ago
      A much bigger portion of the scam economy relies on gift cards than on crypto, yet we seem to be completely okay with gift cards.
    • bapak2 days ago
      I don't see how this is relevant at all and not just a rant about something you don't like.

      People are asked to buy and send crypto, they're not the same people who know what crypto is.

  • neslondavida day ago
    [dead]
  • neslondavida day ago
    [dead]
  • thesources2 days ago
    [dead]
  • neslondavida day ago
    [dead]
  • skeezyboy2 days ago
    [dead]