261 pointsby eh83 days ago45 comments
  • AmsterErdo2 days ago
    I think I don't get it... since it's binary, it can always be guessed in two attempts?
    • gamerDude2 days ago
      It took me 10 tries...
    • williamdclt2 days ago
      I _think_ it's humorous!
    • awwaiid2 days ago
      Yes. You can still try to get it in one attempt.
      • brookst2 days ago
        Odds in one attempt: 1 in 32

        Odds in two attempts: 1 in 1

        • dskloet2 days ago
          Your odds add up to more than 1.
          • pteetor2 days ago
            Probabilities sum to 1.0. Odds don't sum.
          • tonmoy2 days ago
            Odds of getting it within 2 attempts is 1. Odds of getting it on exactly the second attempt is 31/32
        • xandrius2 days ago
          Ooops:

          You won!

          You guessed 01111 in 4 attempts!

          • brooksta day ago
            Well yeah and a fair coin has P(heads) == P(tails) == 0 for someone who eats it.
    • 2 days ago
      undefined
    • sashank_15092 days ago
      I’m glad I figured that out after my first attempt. I feel smart lol.
  • igitur2 days ago
    I'm waiting for the NY Times to sue this one too.[1]

    [1] https://apnews.com/article/new-york-times-wordle-clones-take...

  • tylerchr2 days ago
    My wife took one look at this and said “It’s not Wordle if it’s all binary—it’s Digitle.”
  • umvi3 days ago
    Binary is too easy, but hex can be tricky. I made a hex-based wordle puzzle for my programming game where you have to guess an 8-digit hex string in as few as 6-12 guesses using wordle mechanics... called the level "dwordle" :)

    (video from like 3 years ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/Unity2D/comments/sq4anb/i_added_a_w...)

    • charly1872 days ago
      Someone should make a base-26 version! It would probably be super popular!
  • Aissen3 days ago
    I love that someone went all the way to write and publish this joke. Keep hacking!
  • asimovDev3 days ago
    https://horsle.glitch.me reminds me of this
    • tetris112 days ago
      quite difficult, there aren't many horse anagrams
      • wongogue2 days ago
        My trick is to use HORSE as the starting word.
  • patrakov3 days ago
    Step 1: Guess 00000.

    Step 2: Replace all grey cells with 1s.

    • 0xAFFFF2 days ago
      This is obviously improper. The valid strategy for this game unfolds as follows.

      Step 1: Guess 11111.

      Step 2: Replace all grey cells with 0s.

      Thank you for your careful consideration.

      • nmeofthestate2 days ago
        If you start with 0's you save a small amount of electricity. 1's use up more electricity - any electronic engineer will agree.
        • justsid2 days ago
          Not to ruin a joke, but does it actually make a difference for SRAM? It’s two inverters in a loop, despite not being the same size they are active components. But I’m also a software guy so I could be totally wrong.
          • dskloet2 days ago
            I think displaying black or white pixels makes a bigger difference.
          • bdcs2 days ago
            > does it actually make a difference for SRAM?

            I have no idea in practice. But for the thermodynamic limit of actually making a difference, any irreversible change requires heat to be generated, e.g. initializing to zero, truncating, or bitshifts with discarded information. In contrast, addition/subtraction/multiplication/bitshifts without over-/under- flow will not necessarily generate heat.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landauer%27s_principle

            PS. you can also use mass-energy equivalence to extend this to calculate the lower limit of mass for a given quantity of information. TL;DR: The internet weighs 50g https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WaUzu-iksi8

    • heckelson2 days ago
      And for a second, I was proud that I solved mine in 3 steps...
      • 2 days ago
        undefined
    • paxys3 days ago
      Step 1: Guess anything

      Step 2: Flip all the non green cells.

      • underlines2 days ago
        afaik, guessing anything not 00000 or 11111 at first step will lead to an optimum strategy of 3 steps. because you introduce possible "right digit at wrong place" as a third state.

        guessing 00000 or 11111 removes that third state and leaves you with simple substitution of wrong cells, which leads to an optimal 2 step strategy.

        but obviously the shortest strategy is just guessing it right on the first try :D lol

        • paxys2 days ago
          It doesn't matter.

          Right digit at the wrong place = wrong digit = you should flip it.

          This puzzle won't take more than 2 guesses no matter what you input the first time.

        • Jtsummers2 days ago
          It's still two steps. You only ever need to flip wrong digits.
    • jesse__3 days ago
      I think it's actually possible to win on the second guess with any initial input. Or at least I did it a handful of times..
      • vikingerik3 days ago
        This should be correct. For any cell that isn't green after your first guess, there's only one other possibility for its value.
      • dskloet2 days ago
        It's not guaranteed you will always win in 2 steps because occasionally you will win in 1 step.
        • Supermancho2 days ago
          Isn't 1 within the bounds of 2?
          • Sohcahtoa822 days ago
            There's a difference between "in 2 steps" and "within 2 steps".
            • Supermancho2 days ago
              Splitting hairs seems like grammar policing. I can even see action 1 and null action if I squint hard enough.
      • selcuka3 days ago
        Yes. Yellow and grey mean exactly the same thing in this game: Flip it.
      • IAmBroom2 days ago
        Hoping that you are being sarcastic...
    • petra3033 days ago
      Yea, you don’t need more than two chances.
      • bbassett3 days ago
        and now we know how raid parity works
        • topato3 days ago
          This is some how the most concise description of parity ever
    • stavros2 days ago
    • a3w2 days ago
      I think I saw a two.

      There is no such thing as a two, Bender!

    • Sesse__2 days ago
      I intended this strategy, but 00000 happened to be correct, so I didn't even need a step 2.
    • arjvik3 days ago
      Came here to present my strategy for solving it in two tries, and realized it was far more complicated! (started with 00011)
  • zck2 days ago
    I also made some number-based wordle-variants, which I call "numberdle". I found that it was hard to come up with good ways of guessing because wordle has the restriction that most combinations are invalid. You won't ever have to guess xwqqf, because that's not an English word. And more importantly, guessing some letters gives you information about the other letters. If you find out three letters, and have the target as _a_ts, you can use that to figure out the other two letters.

    But if you need to guess a number, and you know it's _5_34, having three correct digits don't help you figure it out.

    So I made some variants where guessed values do help you figure out the correct answer.

    In rationerdle (https://zck.org/numberdle/?variant=rationerdle), you have to guess a rational number x/y, where both x and y are between 1 and 99, inclusive. It displays the rational number you actually guessed, and whether x and y separately are too high or too low.

    In factordle (https://zck.org/numberdle/?variant=factordle), the player has to guess the factors of a target number.

    In formuladle (https://zck.org/numberdle/?variant=formuladle), there is a graphed straight line, and the player has to guess the mx+b formula that graphs that line.

    I would like to make more, but didn't have any other great ideas when I ran out of interest.

  • abotsis3 days ago
    Yea, it’s too easy. Maybe if it were a “guess the number” but in binary? Hints are just “too high” or “too low”?

    …though now that I’m playing it in my head that’s too easy too. (Start at MSB and shift right if too high and add bits if too low)…

    Maybe if you reduced the number of guesses to 5 that’d add enough chance to make it fun?

    • TheDong3 days ago
      It's not supposed to be fun or hard, it's supposed to be funny. It's absurdist humor.
  • James-Livesey2 days ago
    If anyone's in need of a hexadecimal version... https://jamesl.me/hexle/

    I similarly made a binary one before this version, but unsurprisingly, a lot of people said they found it too easy!

    • charlie-832 days ago
      The hint actually makes it harder since I was required to guess a 0 and a F each time
  • NoSalt2 days ago
    I did it in two attempts ... read it and weep, suckas!
  • NotAnOtter2 days ago
    This delivers on the title but I wonder if you could tweak it to make it an actual game without wildly overcomplicating it.

    Maybe make the string much longer, like 10 bits, and the game only matches on substrings longer than 3. 000...000 would generally return no matches.

    That's still probably solvable with superpermutations but wordle is "solvable" with a dictionary, so don't let perfect be the enemy of "better than 2 guess bordle"

  • mulmen3 days ago
    Got it in 10.
    • Black616Angel3 days ago
      I was a bit sad, when it didn't display my number of tries as a 10.
    • mccolin3 days ago
      There’s 10 types of people in this world: those that get that joke and those that don’t.
      • makerofthings2 days ago
        There are 2 kinds of people in this world, those that can extrapolate from incomplete data.
        • taneq2 days ago
          And fence post errors.
      • rodnim2 days ago
        And those who know this joke is actually in base 3. :)
  • thehours3 days ago
    Feedback: I'm unable to input with keyboard after typing anything but '0' until a full refresh (and selecting the input area with mouse).
    • Jtsummers3 days ago
      You may not need the refresh, with Safari I have to select the game board again after focus is moved by clicking "play again".
  • lazerman2 days ago
    The number of guesses should be written in binary too!
  • bitwrangler2 days ago
    I like the UI and cute idea, nice animation. great way to learn xor $FF haha.
  • nickburlett3 days ago
    Feature request: a "share" button, à la base-26 Wordle.
  • dhsysusbsjsi3 days ago
    I guessed 00000 and won first go!
  • soneca2 days ago
    I guessed my first game in the first attempt! (10011)
  • 2 days ago
    undefined
  • 3 days ago
    undefined
  • bentta day ago
    If this kind of troll app is what we can expect from our vibe coded future, then I'm all for it.
  • kylec3 days ago
    Got it in one on my second game! Felt pretty good till I realized that's like 1/32 chance.
    • selcuka3 days ago
      The probability of getting it right at least once in your first 2 attempts is even higher (6.15%).
  • clocker2 days ago
    Nice game. I got the answer in 1 try in my first attempt!

    https://imgur.com/a/W4OjObH

  • meindnoch2 days ago
    It's not wordle. It's bytle.
  • NooneAtAll32 days ago
    recently I encountered a game that had "wordle, but with numbers" as one of its puzzles

    https://semenar.itch.io/lost-in-space

  • HenryBemis2 days ago
    So....

    1st line, all zeros. It shows me where the zeros are.

    Well.. that's it. Any non-zero is a 1.

    So.. finished on the second line.

    Am I the only one?

    • morcus2 days ago
      Yeah, it's definitely meant to be a joke.

      You also don't need to start with all zeros, any input will allow you to finish on the second try.

    • IAmBroom2 days ago
      That didn't get it?

      No, sadly.

  • citizenfishy2 days ago
    Isn't this just Mastermind?
    • maaaaattttt2 days ago
      Apologies for opening a tangeant on a tangeant, but am I the only one who thinks there are 2 levels of playing master mind (and therefore wordle)? Easy level, you let the player know exactly which spots are correctly placed and which ones are there but incorrectly placed. Hard level, you let the player know only that some are correctly placed and some are there but incorrectly placed without identifiying which ones. I personnaly don't enjoy the easy level when playing mastermind, but I do enjoy the hard version which is much more investigative and in my opinion triggers the same brain process as when I'm debugging code.
      • madcaptenor2 days ago
        I don’t think I’ve ever seen Wordle implemented in what you call “hard level”. But there’s no reason it couldn’t be.
    • zaik2 days ago
      No, this is much simpler.
    • jansan2 days ago
      More like Minionmind.
  • seabass2 days ago
    I love that not only are the inputs binary, but so are the results.
  • lo_zamoyski2 days ago
    Why 5 rows? Just have two.
  • drdec2 days ago
    With this game, there is no try. There is do or do not.
  • sarmadgulzar2 days ago
    So, this can be solved in at least one and at most two attempts.
  • neuroelectron3 days ago
    I see what you did there
  • kcaseg3 days ago
    Bit masking : the game
  • celticninja2 days ago
    Isn't it always possible to get this on guess 2?
  • sidcool3 days ago
    It should be solvable in no more than 2 moves.
    • UnreachableCode3 days ago
      Don’t you mean 10 moves?
      • amanverasia3 days ago
        The only reason I logged into my account is to give you an upvote!
  • itishappy3 days ago
    Is it possible to get yellow cells?
    • Jtsummers3 days ago
      Use a mix of 0s and 1s, if the answer is "00110" and you put in "11000" you'll have 4 yellow and 1 green. If you use only 0s or only 1s for your first guess, you'll just get green and grey, no yellow.
      • itishappy2 days ago
        Huh, surprisingly difficult to get. Took me 8 or so attempts.
    • 3 days ago
      undefined
  • b0a04gl2 days ago
    bitmask bruteforce took 5 ops max.solving fizzbuzz with a GPU.
  • october81402 days ago
    Got it. Second try.
  • alloysmila2 days ago
    only two attempts are ever needed :-(
  • a day ago
    undefined
  • schindlabua3 days ago
    Hilariously dumb
  • nicwolff2 days ago
    I, uh, got it in two. Is it creepy that the answer is my ZIP code?
  • odo12423 days ago
    I somehow got lucky and guessed the answer in just one try lol
    • rossant3 days ago
      How lucky of you. You had one chance out of 100000.
  • 2 days ago
    undefined