It made me step back and think about how some of these AI products are named and I honestly prefer when a product isn't named like a person. Just to think of two: you have "Claude" and "Alexa" which gives the impression you are speaking to a person when you very very much are not.
I gotta say I kind of prefer the name "ChatGPT" that OpenAI went with. It doesn't try to pretend it's a human with it's naming and also describes what it is in it's name.
As the door closed behind them it became apparent that it did indeed have a satisfied sigh-like quality to it. “Hummmmmmmyummmmmmm ah!” it said.
https://rumca-js.github.io/quickstart/public/posts/2025-05-2...
https://www.lightspeedmagazine.com/fiction/the-perfect-match...
There will be fewer and fewer of us in years to come, but real estate doesn’t grow on trees!
https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/22/the-wild-story-of-how-gut-...
Next - they will take the resulting "output" physical mess and turn dump it into a methane fuel-generating waste-treatment plant.
If that still doesn't make enough $$$, and your measured productivity metrics are not good enough, don't worry - if you also end-up living in one of the "techbro sponsored corporate feudal city-states" you can always help the company by being turned into "biodiesel":
https://newrepublic.com/article/183971/jd-vance-weird-terrif...
That’s definitely the bad place