3 pointsby codexy19 hours ago2 comments
  • dogacel18 hours ago
    I think the title should change as

    "AI models hallucinate less than AI company executives"

    • codexy16 hours ago
      Couldn't agree more lol While human hallucinations may only have a limited impact, the implications of AI model hallucinations are uncontrollable given their widespread use in daily life.
  • ggm18 hours ago
    Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence.

    I totally hate the ontology of AI models. It's a constant for me: allowing these words to be come terms of art invites the mis-application of meaning into ordinary discourse.

    Whatever it is they do, doing it less or more than humans isn't the point. They aren't humans, and its not a human behaviour, and trying to sneak it in as "like" is really a sin of commission: it's part of the message to make personhood assumed not tested.

    Do people have rich fantasy life? Do they routinely mis-read and mis-hear, and mis-see? Sure! Thats what a mondegreen is. It's what a whole bunch of Insurance accident reports are: you literally didn't see the other car.

    We functionally live inside a simulation of the world, created internally by the brain. we all know that. So at one level the CEO is being disingenuous.

    I'm thinking about a carrot right now. it has a face. and hands. It's attached to the CEO of Anthropic in several entertaining ways. Does the carrot exist? No: it's a conceptual carrot. But I sure am thinking about it.

    • codexy16 hours ago
      Thanks for the insightful and engaging sharing. I believe that the human brain, along with our cognition and behaviour, is truly the most remarkable creation. The distinct boundaries between humans and AI should not be blurred.