4 pointsby marche10121 hours ago4 comments
  • 20 hours ago
    undefined
  • interestoo16 hours ago
    It was already mentioned, have a look at coderpad.com. Though I am not using it for hiring- I know if because I'm long term fan of codingame.com which they bought. Codingame runs quaterly community events, that's where I used coderpad. I liked the IDE and report.
  • Sharon92919 hours ago
    We've been in a similar spot — running ~150 interviews/year mostly for junior candidates. Like you, we just need a reliable, low-friction way to collaboratively code and run things in real time. Most of the "extra" stuff (AI, automated scoring, prebuilt questions) just gets in the way for us.

    We ended up switching from Repl.it to CoderPad. It's not perfect, but it nails the basics:

    Collaborative editor with syntax support for most major languages

    Real-time execution in the cloud (including terminal-based ones like Python, Bash)

    Solid multi-user support — you can watch what they’re typing and guide them easily

    No fluff

    Other options we evaluated:

    Codeshare: decent for quick interviews but lacks execution support

    CodeInterview.io: had potential but felt a bit janky UX-wise

    Visual Studio Code Live Share: great experience but assumes the candidate has a local dev environment, which is a no-go for us

    CoderPad is around the same price range as Replit, but at least we feel like we’re paying for what we actually use. Hope that helps!

  • brudgers19 hours ago
    we're paying ReplIt $1500 now

    In a lot of organizations, it is pretty easy to burn a significant multiple of $1500 switching systems you use 0% of because the business does not stick.

    What I mean is the question reads (to me) as if the only motivations for switching are irritation with the marketing and not finding additional value in the new features.

    That might not exhaust the list of actual problems, but those are the only ones I can suss from the question. If you were going to build rather than buy, maybe they might make a better business case. Good luck.