201 pointsby codewiz5 days ago10 comments
  • rollcat4 days ago
    I love the sound of the SID chip, happy to find out about this project as well: https://github.com/frntc/SIDKick-pico

    8 Bit Weapon are making some fantastic use of it:

    https://8bitweapon.bandcamp.com/album/disassembly-language-a...

    https://8bitweapon.bandcamp.com/album/disassembly-language-a...

    https://8bitweapon.bandcamp.com/album/modular-sidsation

    LukHash also regularly features C64s in his kit:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JQkW6BgUYU

    Share your favourite artists!

  • wiz21c4 days ago
    > rewritten graphics rendering code (running 5-10 times as fast as the previous code while sacrificing some compatibility)

    argh, too bad. If one goes the cycle-accurate way, then not doing everything accurate is a bit strange... I wonder why they made that choice...

    • fb034 days ago
      I found that design decision a bit odd as well, as the author states multiple times that he's interested in cycle-accurate emulation. When people go for a cycle-accurate emulator, they are purposely eschewing performance for accuracy. e.g. the Higan emulator which focuses on accuracy/code readability, but it's one of the slowest SNES cores out there (and it's fine)
      • chillingeffect4 days ago
        I took that to mean it takes less pico cpu power to reach the same cycle-accuracy.

        Esp since there arent graphics routines in the c64 to speak of! There are no plot, screen clear, line, etc. Every program rolls its own.

        As a joke a real freak could polyfill/hijack e.g $ffd2 output single char to cursor position in native pico code instead of 6502 to accel basic programs. That could be weird and phone to speed up all thise routines... but at that point just clock it all faster :)

  • sandos5 days ago
    Ohh, at first I was excited to see if this mean you could just replace parts of the C64 with some nice modern building blocks: I have a very old C64 that I don't want to cannibalize for parts that has a broken clock module. But this is not quite that. :)
  • abhisek5 days ago
    So cool! Things we would do to re-live the past. Not really into hardware but I remember trying to build an emulator for z80 just to learn how it work for old Sega games
  • sunpazed5 days ago
    Love this! The C64 introduced me to the world of computers as a kid. I still have that almost 40 year old machine in my collection, but I’m weary of failure every time I turn it on. This is somewhat better than the MiSTer as I can use physical peripherals with it. Great work!
    • Gergo5 days ago
      The most common failure points in these old boxes are the capacitors and the power supply. Swap out all the caps and replace the original power supply for a modern remake and the 64 could last you another 40 years. :)
  • chillingeffect5 days ago
    I love it. Ive been reviving a stack of 4 c64s i got untested for $285. I noticed CIA chip replacements cost 40-45 and was wondering if an Rpi pico could replace it! I'll bet they combined two CIAs into one. I'm curious if they repeat the typical 24+ pin bus (16 addr, 8 data, plus more control lines).
    • robinsonb55 days ago
      Not directly - you'd need level shifters to handle the 5V signals in the C64. (The RP2040 isn't "officially" 5V tolerant - there are certain circumstances where you can get away with wiring some its inputs directly to 5V logic, but those circumstances exclude bidirectional IO.)
    • croemer5 days ago
      Do CIA chip replacements come with a backdoor? </s>
      • genewitch5 days ago
        Yes, via the frame buffer interface pins
  • bitwize4 days ago
    I've long thought it should be possible to get timing-correct emulation by having multiple CPUs each emulate some component, rather than emulating everything on one CPU. It's cool to see this idea put into practice; the devil is always in the details.
  • gitroom4 days ago
    Love how people still put so much effort into keeping old C64s going, makes me wanna fix up my own stash tbh.
  • eabeezxjc4 days ago
    I am in favor of this solution. But let it not be closed. Let's also run fuzix.org on it .
  • JO_lafrite6555 days ago
    [flagged]