53 pointsby theahura11 hours ago7 comments
  • janalsncm11 hours ago
    Title needs to be updated but I think the text of the order is noteworthy.

    If I had just gotten a job offer to come to the US this kind of thing might give me pause, if for no other reason than no one knows how it will be used.

    For a long time, the US has punched well above its weight in talent compared to our education system due to our ability to reliably attract top talent. And the best companies want to be here, which pushes our wages up.

    It might not always be that way.

    • theahura10 hours ago
      Open to suggestions for an edit or will let dang do it (sorry for creating more work for you @dang). That said, I do stand by the title. This EO demands the use of military to 'prevent crime' and 'assist in law enforcement'. This is the definition of martial law. ("Martial law is the replacement of civilian government by military rule and the suspension of civilian legal processes for military powers.")
      • rbanffy10 hours ago
        Not quite martial law, but close enough for discomfort. I hope the military are well trained enough and will just refuse to comply. I know I would.
    • rbanffy10 hours ago
      > If I had just gotten a job offer to come to the US this kind of thing might give me pause

      For me it was the active shooter drills in schools. I just didn’t want my daughter to (then about five years old) go through any of that. If I were younger and had no kids, I’d consider, but I’d need to price many things into the compensation package.

      The last few months made me decide not to visit the US in the next four years at least. It’s not a decision made lightly, but a needed one.

  • Eextra95311 hours ago
    Another lame attempt at subverting the constitution by trying to rule like a king. I hope this order gets challenged and struck down as soon as possible. If the current administration wants lasting change then it should do it the right way, through Congress. He has both houses on his side so why isn't he making things 'great' in a way that's compatible with the constitution?
    • rbanffy10 hours ago
      > I hope this order gets challenged and struck down as soon as possible

      Me too, but considering the threats to jail judges who judge against the administration, I’m not holding my breath.

      It’s also easy to me to say that because there’s an ocean between me and the US.

  • alphabettsy4 hours ago
    > Within 60 days of the date of this order, the Attorney General shall review all ongoing Federal consent decrees, out-of-court agreements, and post-judgment orders to which a State or local law enforcement agency is a party and modify, rescind, or move to conclude such measures that unduly impede the performance of law enforcement functions.

    Chicago was under one of these for having a secret site where they regularly violated people’s constitutional rights and beat them. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/feb/24/chicago-poli...

    This is what they’re hoping to return to?

  • alphabettsy4 hours ago
    > strengthen and expand legal protections for law enforcement officers

    How much stronger can they possibly get? Anything outside of murder on tape seems to be excused as justifiable and even that’s not a situation where accountability is guaranteed.

  • theahura11 hours ago
    From the order:

    > Sec. 4. Using National Security Assets for Law and Order. (a) Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security and the heads of agencies as appropriate, shall increase the provision of excess military and national security assets in local jurisdictions to assist State and local law enforcement. (b) Within 90 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Attorney General, shall determine how military and national security assets, training, non-lethal capabilities, and personnel can most effectively be utilized to prevent crime.

    > Sec. 5. Holding State and Local Officials Accountable. The Attorney General shall pursue all necessary legal remedies and enforcement measures to enforce the rights of Americans impacted by crime and shall prioritize prosecution of any applicable violations of Federal criminal law with respect to State and local jurisdictions whose officials: (a) willfully and unlawfully direct the obstruction of criminal law, including by directly and unlawfully prohibiting law enforcement officers from carrying out duties necessary for public safety and law enforcement; or (b) unlawfully engage in discrimination or civil-rights violations under the guise of “diversity, equity, and inclusion” initiatives that restrict law enforcement activity or endanger citizens.

    > Sec. 6. Use of Homeland Security Task Forces. The Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall utilize the Homeland Security Task Forces (HSTFs) formed in accordance with Executive Order 14159 of January 20, 2025 (Protecting the American People Against Invasion) to coordinate and advance the objectives of this order.

    A plain reading states that Trump intends to use federal forces to arrest state and local officials and to enforce laws in non-federal-land.

    • water911 hours ago
      federal law applies everywhere in United States. Where did you get the idea it doesn’t?
      • rbanffy11 hours ago
        Should the federal government be able to imprison judges who judge the federal government is overreaching and/or doing something illegal?
        • water911 hours ago
          No, the executive branch is responsible for imprisoning. Judges are supposed to interpret the law passed by the legislative branch. They don’t pass law from the bench. The executive branch enforces the law.
          • rbanffy10 hours ago
            They are supposed to, but that’s not what it says at “State and local jurisdictions whose officials: (a) willfully and unlawfully direct the obstruction of criminal law, including by directly and unlawfully prohibiting law enforcement officers from carrying out duties necessary for public safety and law enforcement”
      • jmye9 hours ago
        The tenth amendment is a good starting point.
  • josefritzishere4 hours ago
    I think this says we're all being sent to concentration camps.
  • MartinGAugustin7 hours ago
    [dead]