Seems like same rule about flags[1]: a child should be able to draw it from memory.
Only Barty seems to fit these conditions.
If a rule is overly complex, no one can remember it and there can be no expectation for people to follow.
tldr: All rules are guides. Be they rules rules or "rules" rules
Im a grown ass man and can't draw the US flag properly from memory, much less the many far more complicated flags out there.
I don't think that definition is particularly useful.
CGP Grey has a lot of opinions[1] about this.
It's not a "you should" kind of rule either. It's something someone made up and wants to persuade other people of for no particular reason, similar to "don't split infinitives".
There is no benefit to having people be able to draw the flag accurately. A flag has two purposes:
1. Be easy to recognize.
2. Be visually impressive.
Two good flags are the flag of California and the flag of Saudi Arabia. You'd have a hard time drawing either one, but that's not a problem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_California
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Saudi_Arabia
(Note also that I've seen a Spaniard claim her flag was easy to draw. She meant that it's easy to draw if you don't bother to draw the coat of arms.)
> There is no benefit to having people be able to draw the flag accurately. A flag has two purposes:
The purposes you mention are much more easily achieved by being simple to draw.Yes, it is something "someone is arguing" but it's congruent with general design principles you will see in most domains.
> a Spaniard claim her flag was easy to draw. She meant that it's easy to draw if you don't bother to draw the coat of arms.
She's not exactly wrong. Many countries use variants of flags for different uses. In the case of Spain[0] the civil flag does not have the coat of arms.For a similar case, see the flag of Germany[1], Austria[2], Peru[3], Finland[4], Italy[5], and need I go on?
I don't think you should be ashamed for not knowing, but it's worth recognizing how easy it is to miscommunicate because different inherent assumptions are being made. In your case it is unsurprising that there is this disagreement because she sees the civil flag commonly and you don't, so it seems like a cop-out to you while it is pretty reasonable for her. There's surprisingly (annoyingly) a lot of depth to seemingly simple things.
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Spain
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Germany
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Austria
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Peru
No, that is not true for either purpose. Being simple to draw is a negative in both cases:
(1) Things that are simple to draw can be easy to recognize, but things that are complex are easier to recognize.
(2) Things that are simple to draw are never visually impressive.
And the flags that are easy to draw are so simple that it's interfering with the ability to recognize them. The first example there would be Ireland vs the Ivory Coast:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Ireland
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Ivory_Coast
Another common confusion is Russia vs France, though in that case someone who needs to be able to tell the difference won't have trouble:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_Russia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_of_France
> For a similar case, see the flag of Germany[1], Austria[2], Peru[3], Finland[4], Italy[5], and need I go on?
Go on? Try beginning first. Every single one of those links presents the flag without the coat of arms as a default and the flag with the coat of arms as a special case.
I like DPS-kun from beatmaniaⅡᴅx copula: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcfmIKKMu7Y
They made a plush of him that's very cute too
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OInuZFHeQo
[2] https://www.city.kyoto.lg.jp/kotsu/cmsfiles/contents/0000215...
Not how I picture a BART car that has "seen it all".
I've never seen anything like the BART anywhere else - and I don't mean that in a positive way.
It's late where I am, I'm about to go to bed, and now this image of a BART car that has "seen it all" is going to haunt me... I might eat a load of cheese to calm the dreams down...
To the defenders: I ask you to please describe your memory of “the BART smell” from the cloth-seat era, if you have such firsthand experience.
I do remember. Many years make a strong impression. And while that specific smell-memory is largely indescribable, it’s nonetheless and unfortunately quite unforgettably awful.
My attempt: imagine a laundry hamper very full of very dirty clothes, including a few with fecal/other/mystery stains, slow-baked for weeks in a warm closet. Now open the closet door and take a deep nasal breath— that’s what stepping onto the train was like. I feel zero positive nostalgia.
> Dislikes: Tight corners (screeches!)
My own transit system has sort of developed two mascots. They are not as artful or clever as BART's, but they are designed with a utilitarian purpose: to demonstrate good vs. bad behavior while onboard.
https://www.valleymetro.org/blog/2019/10/quick-guide-light-r...
The characters are named "Right" and "Rong", both humanoids who are differentiated primarily by color and mood. Right, of course, does all the right things and abides by the rules, while Rong is a classic example of the scofflaw you wouldn't want sitting next to you.
The Anime Mascots are a good touch.
https://observer.com/2017/10/la-metro-promotes-transit-etiqu...
It would be consistent with (at least my conception of) SF's public messaging.
I don't believe astrology is real, but I've assigned birthdays to some of my characters based on zodiac signs which are said to align with their personality, simply because it's cute and fun. I was inspired by the characters of Sailor Moon, each of which have a birthday in a zodiac sign ruled by their associated planet. (So Moon is a Cancer, Mercury is a Virgo, etc.).