Tech companies pay in stocks because they choose to, not just because they can. And they pay employees more because they look at the revenue the employee brings. I interviewed at so many no traditional companies for tech roles and their attitudes about compensation is the reason they do not get the hires they want. Forget stocks, JP Morgan would not match the base salary that’s pretty much the standard at my level in my area, tech and non tech companies. Walmart would not match my overall compensation at my current role at a not so big, boring tech company that doesn’t dish out RSUs.
I also didn't understand the focus of the article on privacy. How established is that the difference between American and German users is due to legacy protection? There's differences in the two countries other than privacy. For example people in Germany are a lot less driven by consumption, making them less valuable for advertisers.
EDIT ok so in a sense you good argue it has no cost for the company, but it definitely has a cost to the shareholders.
Amazon can buy lots of things with stock – not just the labor of in-demand technical workers who command six-figure salaries."
This is the corporate version of Modern Monetary Theory.
I think that Cory Doctorow should skip the economic analysis and stick to what he does well, whatever that is.