The idea is this "identity card", which is super early in our dev process. The goal is to make it so you can have your voice as a thoroughly vetted example, and then be able to use that to finetune LLMs, or use it at inference time to enhance LLM outputs to sound more like you.
We'll be building out a full CMS, and shipping parts of it over time.
Thanks again, it's super early but we're working on it. :)
You have piqued my interest.
Can you explain in more detail how a user will fine tune a model. Will the LLM just replicate a user's conversational style? Or will the user be able to set deeper parameters, for example to define goal-oriented outputs for agentic actions?
From there, you can create examples for every sentence and classify them... ie "this is a good example" or "this is almost a good example."
Then, after you have a good enough enough number of human versions (idk this number yet), you can use those to create dozens more examples, refine, etc... then at some point you've thoroughly described a document enough that there's no more delta. Then you can use the document to train / finetune / infer.
The effects are that the "instincts" of the model (if on the training / weights) or the "thoughts" of the model (at inference time) are closer to a well vetted baseline.
And Bolt Foundry is truly the perfect first adopter! As "A big tech dev experience" implies, they're very focused on providing great DevEx. And a bunch of them previously worked at Meta, where they used Relay, and understood the powers that it provides.
Isograph aims to provide an even better developer experience (see the YouTube link), and give you the things that previously were only feasible at FAANG-co scale: e.g. even in a very dynamic app, fetching just the JavaScript and data you end up using.
So far, they've had a great experience using Isograph!! You should also [give it a try] or [contribute].
[Isograph]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sf8ac2NtwPY
[give it a try]: https://isograph.dev/docs/quickstart
[contribute]: https://github.com/isographlabs/isograph
You can assume 1 person with at least some practice in writing will have a clear tone and presence in the things they write, but this would be rather useful for corporate communications, especially when simpleton engineers (such as myself) try to write blog posts for a company engineering blog. If there was something nudging me towards the style of the blog, without steam rolling me constantly by rewriting everything, I would like that.
For the CMS, (I think you're building a CMS?) I think building around THAT use case would be an awesome selling point. Let content folk spawn special ephemeral links that let someone write up a draft without having to set up an account. Have some sort of approval process in there too, that could be configured on that "magic link", so I don't impulsively publish to everyone.
Make it super easy to just stumble into writing something the company can actually communicate with, right away. There's a lot of passionate people at companies, with 0 writing experience that would lend a lot of authenticity to blogs/engineering comms/recruiting ads, if they they had the bumpers in their bowling lane.
You'll need to toss on
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0" />
I would also remove the overflow:hidden on body, and remove the fixed height on #root. Nothing needs to be a scrollable container here, the viewport can just scroll over the body. That's causing the bottom ~2 paragraphs to be "stuck" under the bottom edge of my iPhone 13 mini in safari. Ideally use `min-height:100dvh`.
This is basically a tool to train a computer to "steal" your voice. I find that sad.
Why can't we figure out how to use this technology in something other than creative tasks? I don't care what anyone says, a blog post showing off some technology or accomplishment should be a creative task, otherwise what's the point?
it’s not about having it write for you, it’s about having it help you write better.
writing is thinking, but 90% of writing is editing.
I am going to slog through it but I would recommend checking on mobile Safari in the future.
I mean it is possible. But another comment mentioned it's broken on Android mobile too.
They do seem to be working on it though which is great.
The text on the site and the text in the post is the same though.
it’s not about having it write for you, it’s about scaling who you are to do lower value tasks.
That did not seem cohesive.
I am all for new and better content management systems, and like all geeks written at least two of them, but what is our plan for the CMS?
Making a Twitter card does not seem that relevant?
Am I stuck on the wrong CMS interetation?
Why/How will this be different than WordPress? (or any ohter)
like i said earlier in the thread maybe this is a bit too early, but we’ll have stuff to share over time.
sorry it’s confusing… working on it.