More recent computer models of convection suggest that many such worlds would have sufficient convective activity, cycling between altitudes from one side of the planet to the other, to maintain gasses and liquids on the surface.
To match the observations, a model simply requires something about higher CO2 levels which specifically encourage hygrothermal exchange between poles and equator, and/or significantly insulates the poles against radiative losses in disproportionate ways versus today. CO2 itself doesn't seem likely to cause this because it's in the gaseous phase for almost all of Earth's history, but substantially increased water in the atmosphere would be the first suspect because water is such a strong thermal reflector when a cold liquid, and not so much when a gas.
Study reveals palm trees once thrived in subarctic Canada
https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1074307
New study reveals Canada’s subarctic was once a tropical paradise
https://www.ctvnews.ca/sci-tech/article/new-study-reveals-ca...
> BAYSPAR measurements indicate extremely high sea surface temperatures of 40 °C (104 °F) to 45 °C (113 °F) at low latitudes,
I'm going to take a wild guess that humans aren't doing so good near the equator with 45°C oceans. Though it's definitely interesting that the temperature gradient flattened out so much.
"As temperatures rise, farms are sprouting in Alaska
Even as farms decline across the U.S., a longer growing season is bringing food security to a state that has long relied on sustenance from afar."
https://images.theconversation.com/files/325868/original/fil...