Talk about stalkers paradise!
> advanced property survey solution that provides a breadth of actionable data from the ground, the interior and the sky, then applies AI-driven insights to help U.S. insurance carriers identify, retain and acquire profitable risks – all without having to send someone on site for a physical property inspection.
https://risk.lexisnexis.com/products/flyreelDepending on the amount of information, you'll received a report that can be several hundred pages.
It's crazy how much data they have on most people.
edit: this applies only to us (i'm european so i can't ask for my data but i am curios about it): you can request to access the data they have about you here https://consumer.risk.lexisnexis.com/request
if you click on online form instructions they tell you how to correct infos about you as well
Supposedly the checks have actually gotten better, but I'm skeptical.
What they mean is, they parked it, like a car, put a stop to, ceased movement.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2024/05/15/cruise-...
What is happening here is impunity.
Will that get removed? Because those people's rates are affected.
The stretch and spin on this is pretty insane. I guess it's true if you're forced to do it by a client who you come to care about because they're the federal government and they've named, shamed, and sued you. Yet another reason to continue to avoid American made cars.
The act itself is obviously customer-hostile, and it's at least fairly obvious that at some point you'll get caught out. So why risk it? It could be a rogue executive, but it could also be that consumers are known to care so little about things like this that the blowback is factorable as a cost of doing business, like the apocryphal Ford fuel tank story. I wonder which is the reality.
Stop buying 'smart' things.
On my end, I've never bought a car with that crap in it, and I've never purchased from a dealer who also sells new cars. I shouldn't have any trouble keeping my car nice for another 30yrs, probably replacing the engine and transmission once ($3-4k/ea in today's dollars if I shop around). Hopefully other free-market alternatives exist by then.
1. Incremental costs like tires/oil/gas/insurance matter a lot more than the purchase price and repairs. That has some knock-on impacts:
a. Most people on HN can easily afford to not carry full coverage if they drive something like a 2012 Civic. If the thing is totalled and not covered by the other party, just buy another. If you purchase with a loan or buy a more expensive car then even a lot of developers in their first few years (the majority of developers IIRC) can't afford that luxury and have to purchase full coverage -- paying for the same risk they'd assume by not having full coverage, plus the insurance company's profits.
b. The first 5-10 years of a car's life are expensive not just because of depreciation, insurance, and financial instruments but also because of a lack of cheap replacement parts and requirements for things like specific kinds of oil without good third-party substitutes.
c. Gas mileage (or equivalent electric costs, based on how you'll actually charge the thing in real life) was the driving factor behind the sweet spot being closer to 8-14 year old cars rather than even older cars (you don't have much significant amortized repair cost till at least a 20yr old car).
d. You can save almost as much money adopting relaxed, safe driving habits as you can optimizing the purchase year. Instead of hitting the gas right up until the car in front of you at a red light and then hitting your brakes, try coasting in. If there's nobody at the light and you'll definitely have to stop before it turns, slow down early and coast toward it rather than slowing down at the end (so that you can maintain 10-20mph of kinetic energy as the light turns green rather than coming to a complete stop). If you're driving somewhere with a lot of stop signs, it's probably residential and shouldn't be driven in quickly anyway, but lower your top speed to the actual speed limit (25 vs 30mph with frequent stops saves 30% on your incremental gas mileage).
2. The first few years of ownership are much more expensive than even years 18, 19, 20. Depreciation hits like a truck.3. If you lease or take out anything like a 3yr+ loan, the extra cost of that financial instrument more than makes up for the extra repairs even out to a 30yr old car.
4. The sweet-spot in cost-per-year (keeping in mind that with transaction costs you can't save money switching to an optimally aged car every year) was in the 8-14yr range, depending on a lot of factors. Since gas mileage has not significantly improved since I ran these numbers, and since cars are more reliable, I expect the cheapest cars to own to be much older than that (probably 15-20yrs, but that's just a hunch). Electric cars throw a potential wrench in things, but whether those are actually cheaper is a lot more sensitive to your personal situation than with gas cars, so I won't touch on it.
5. Repairs on old cars are much more expensive when you put them off. Hear a knocking as you turn while driving? Have the mechanic replace a bushing or whatever. Haven't replaced anything for 2yrs? Have the mechanic inspect all your various bushings/housings/... during your normal oil change (mechanics tend to be cheaper and better than all those quick-oil-change places by the way). Getting towed to a mechanic and having to rent a car, skip work, uber, or mooch off a friend is expensive. Addressing problems proactively is cheaper than newish-car depreciation out to at least 30yrs -- even counting a (stochastic) engine or transmission replacement somewhere in that interval.
Cost of ownership depends on a lot of factors. The broad trends are largely correct, but the exact inflection point depends on your insurance's perception of your risk level, whether you drive significantly more/less than the average person, .... If you drive fewer miles each year, older cars are even more attractive.
some companies collect data on your sex life. i'm not sure i wanna know why
Consumers in the USA really need equivalent law to protect their personal data from scrotes like these. Collecting unnecessary personal data should be a liability, not an asset.