It also reminded me that they released one of the first comprehensive open source C++ libraries way back It originally predated templates and Boost so I'd be very surprised if anyone uses it anymore.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/ose/
http://www.pennelynn.com/Documents/CUJ/HTML/14.04/PATAPIS/PA...
https://www.google.com/maps/@-24.8687566,113.7039752,3a,75y,...
We actually still use OSE on my team believe it or not. The project started in 1997, so OSE was a great choice for container structures / string handling / etc.
We are re-factoring OSE usages to use standard library features as we go along. But the project is huge with a very small team; hence why we still use it.
Tom Scott did a nice video¹ visiting it a little while back - as a vintage computing enthusiast I was rather pleased to see a PDP-11 in their equipment racks!
I remember reading something in The Hitch-hikers Guide to the Galaxy as a child and not just not knowing where "Jodrell Bank and Woomera" were, but not knowing what manner of thing they were either :)
And we have the Pawsey Supercomputer that is working through a lot of the SKA data. https://pawsey.org.au/
A few weeks ago, there was a post about another radio dish being resurrected up in Denmark (maybe????). I love that these are being refurbished instead of just trying to build new ones.
Most RF systems also won't convert right to fiber at the feed but have some kind of upconverter / downconverter assembly in the hub. Those converters might have fiber connectivity but more often than not it is some kind of intermediate IF frequency around the L/S-Band where the conversion to optical takes place separately.
While I am rambling on, I think the applications of this antenna will be very limited. The frequencies in use are generally speaking much higher now than they were 40 years ago (they picked up NSS-12 at 4 GHz, which is more or less DC these days). At lower frequencies you can get away with a lot of slop with regard to RMS surface accuracy and the like, but the Ruze equation is a harsh mistress and gain suffers considerably as frequencies go up. Modern antennas designed to work at higher frequencies will have a much better overall stiffness and surface accuracy, so you have more gain at the same diameter vs an old beast like this. All this is probably moot because an antenna feed like this designed for low frequencies won't even pass high frequencies.
The servo system is also another issue. They picked up a signal from a geostationary satellite which is as easy as it gets. If the satellite is inclined or (worse) in LEO / GEO, things get much tougher. And the higher the frequency, the tougher it gets because the antenna beamwidth is much tighter for a given diameter.