310 pointsby CrankyBear9 days ago7 comments
  • unethical_ban9 days ago
    Wow. RIP. It is a name I hadn't thought of in years. I was on Ubuntu Forums and some other Ubuntu communities as an observer/power user, and I recall him being a source of knowledge and education. "slangesek".

    45, so young. Thanks for being there for all of us re: Ubuntu!

  • davidw9 days ago
    Sad news. He did a lot for Debian and Ubuntu.
  • tartoran9 days ago
    RIP Steve Langasek and thank you for your contributions to Ubuntu.
  • kopirgan9 days ago
    So young.. It's sad
  • lukeh8 days ago
    Sad news. His name is familiar from the LDAP days.
  • cute_boi9 days ago
    45 years :(

    The article says illness, but which illness?

    • vanc_cefepime9 days ago
      Could be anything, sadly. Tteck, from Proxmox helper scripts recently died as well but did inform the GitHub community it was appendiceal cancer. Sadly he went quite quick too.

      I had a medical colleague who unexpectedly died at 33 after Christmas.

      Life is short. Hug your loved ones and let them know you love them everyday.

      • zblevins9 days ago
        Reading this while holding my new born and man does this hit you right in the gut.
        • tartoran9 days ago
          I feel it too. My kid is 6 and my most important goal right now is survive and be able to provide until he becomes a young adult. My father died right when I was 20 year old and while it was hard I managed. I can't image how hard it would've been growing up without a dad. And without a mom is probably even worse but I let moms worry about that.
          • maeil8 days ago
            Staying alive isn't enough - plenty of kids with dads (or moms) who are alive but still grow up without them.
            • tartoran8 days ago
              Absolutely, staying alive but not being part of the child's life is not much different than being dead from their point of view. In my case I have a very good connection with my kid and spend a lot of time together, my kid gets priority over a lot of other things such as personal goals...
        • giancarlostoro9 days ago
          As they get older it hits harder, just the thought of any harm.
          • zblevins9 days ago
            Yea, I find myself growing increasingly sensitive. I spent several years in Afghanistan and now the most mildest of violence even in media bothers me. I couldn’t imagine either of my sons having to go through that or anyone else’s children. Life is so incredibly precious and until proven otherwise rare.
        • danieldk9 days ago
          Yeah. This really changed for me after getting a kid. The thought I hope to live long enough to see my kid do X crosses my mind on a regular basis. Makes you enjoy all of it much more, especially because a lot of things that I can see her do now, I wished to see ~10 years ago.
        • IncreasePosts9 days ago
          [flagged]
          • zblevins9 days ago
            Sheesh man that’s pretty damn dark.
    • dezgeg9 days ago
      According to his Mastodon, stage 4 colon cancer
      • mmasu9 days ago
        do your colonoscopies early. It’s not a fun thing to do, but it can save your life
        • ANewFormation9 days ago
          The statistics on early detection are very different than most think. Colonoscopies were one of the only tests with a statistically significant positive outcome, but even that has been challenged recently by multiple studies. [1]

          I don't know the exact cause colonoscopies are not performing as thought, but for breast cancer it's quite interesting - basically treatment was improving at the exact same time early screening was being heavily promoted. And so years of survival continued to increase in a strongly proportional way to early screenings.

          Naturally people assumed the correlation was causal, but it turns out screening mammograms are only marginally effective and that women are significantly more likely to receive unnecessary treatment (treating small tumors that would not have developed into large malignant tumors) than to receive beneficial treatment. [2]

          If screening provides someone with piece of mind, then more power to them, but you're unlikely to meaningfully extend your life.

          [1] https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-03228-z

          [2] - https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1600249

        • officeplant9 days ago
          It sucks that you have to basically choke the money out of insurance to get them done prior to age 45. I found polyps by paying thousands out of pocket when insurance told me 36 was too young and there wasn't enough blood in my stool. That's with a mother having them removed at 19, and older brother having them removed at 39.
          • bluGill9 days ago
            Given your family history they should have been done young. However they are not completely risk free and so for most of us the standard guideline of 50 is good enough.

            There are less invasive tests that can be done instead as well. They are not as likely to find cancer (which is why you should have done the more invasive colonoscopy), and if they do find anything you have to do a colonoscopy anyway, so for those with less family history who have unexplained bleeding while young they are a good option. Ask your doctor about the pros and cons of them if this comes up. (I suspect once you reach 50 a colonoscopy every 10 years is the right answer)

        • TacticalCoder8 days ago
          > do your colonoscopies early. It’s not a fun thing to do, but it can save your life

          It's actually not that bad. I did it six months ago (at 51 y/o, never having done any before that), after reading an identical comment on HN saying to just go and do it.

          I don't know about other countries but I could choose between no anesthesia at all, light one or full anesthesia. I went for the light one: you don't really fall asleep but you don't really remember either the silly things you say. After a few minutes (15 at most?) you're fully conscious again.

          Zero polyps to remove and all crystal clear, doctor told me to come back for a checkup in 5 or 6 years.

          So I confirm: just go and do it.

    • bragr9 days ago
      Neither any of the articles I looked up nor his obituaries name the illness so I assume he wanted that kept private. Probably not how I'd handle it, but to each their own.
      • bluGill9 days ago
        Depends. AIDS (this is treatable these days, but I'm using it as an example) would imply a history of something he would want to keep secret from his conservative church. Of course I have no idea what his religion is, nor what he died of. If it is cancer - while rare at his age it happens and isn't something I'd be embarrassed of but maybe he was.

        To some extent too, you don't get to chose this, those who write your obituary do. Perhaps his wife (I have no idea if he was marred) and him have a disagreement on what is embarrassing and so even though he would have shared this she wanted it secret.

        • fred_is_fred9 days ago
          This is some awful speculation. You speculate that he had AIDS and was embarrassed by his church or that his wife was embarrassed. You don't know if he was religious, you don't know if he was married, and you certainly don't know if he had AIDS. Why even comment?
          • bluGill8 days ago
            Speculation has a specific definition which does not apply (I checked several online dictionaries). I was offering examples of things, but not considering them and therefore was not speculating.