The CP rings showed up at much higher levels than before with the Brazil bump. We run every image through Thorn’s fingerprinting service. That helps us with attempts to upload the media, but then they advertise telegrams and you have to root them out.
Is it insidious and just totally under the surface everywhere or is it more localized?
"Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something."
So anyone who starts a website allowing public posting needs to hire moderators fluent in the hundreds of languages that will be used there? There's at least 18 languages that are widely officially used across the world, plus more that are national languages of only one country, and over 7,000 total languages in existence.
This is why we have Section 230. Otherwise, we would only be able to use "approved" languages online to avoid liability, which would obviously be terrible.
In the EU, that's how it goes. I think there's a minimum amount of visits/users though
> Why doesn’t Bluesky block known keywords and terms like “child pornography” or “cp”?
> Does Bluesky have different strategies for dealing with text posts discussing child sexual abuse or grooming and images of child exploitation?
That's 90s tech and useless today. Not only are long-term accounts never going to post it verbatim (if they want to survive on the platform), it will block both normal communication about the issue and unrelated things (lots of cp in shell scripts). There are way better approaches to detection available.
When anyone tries that anyway, we get the expected results. Like "the event that can't be mentioned" and "unalive" on YouTube.