3 pointsby mehdizare3 hours ago2 comments
  • sermakarevich2 hours ago
    there might be not much good enough solutions on the market yet that would substitute senior eng review

    I am digging into this for some time and the main reason seems to be in definition of what good review is. Its less about finding bugs and more about code evolvability, maintainability and simplicity. without some context that would give a hint how the app will evolve over time, is maintained and what is simple/hard for live person - llm struggle to deliver useful insights here.

    here you can find some related papers: https://github.com/sermakarevich/ai_knowledge_wiki/blob/mast...

    • mehdizarean hour ago
      Agree, maybe we need to build something. It sounds like a good use case. Claude has a /pr-review that sometimes does a good job, but it's not consistent.
  • Bender3 hours ago
    A while back I used Gerrit for reviewing changes to infrastructure automation, not sure if that counts.
    • mehdizare3 hours ago
      Cool! do you know if it has AI review component?
      • Bender3 hours ago
        I have not used it in a while. No idea if they added any AI related features. If not I would imagine one could add a hook to submit the code to AI.